We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Trusts guaranteed by government like savings accounts?

I am thinking about investing in a gift trust with the Norwich Union, but I'm concerned in the present climate about the risk of losing the money in the event of it going under. Does anyone know whether there are any guarantees from the government regarding trust funds, similar to the ones for up to £35k for savings accounts?

In the same way that we are advised to spread the risk by having no more than £35k in savings at each bank, would I be better off having the money earmarked for the trust to be spread around different institutions?
Thanks for any replies.
stay lucky!
Steve.

Comments

  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 121,360 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    but I'm concerned in the present climate about the risk of losing the money in the event of it going under.
    You are concerned about one of the biggest and well capitalised insurance companies in Europe going under?
    Does anyone know whether there are any guarantees from the government regarding trust funds, similar to the ones for up to £35k for savings accounts?
    100% of first £2000 and 90% of the rest with no upper limit (assuming you are using the NU portfolio step down or level option.
    would I be better off having the money earmarked for the trust to be spread around different institutions
    Not really.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • Thanks dunstonh. Could I just clarify your point of 90% of the first £2k being guaranteed by the government and 100% of the rest.

    If, for e.g, I invested £100k in the gift trust and in the (hopefully very unlikely!) event of the NU going under, I would only stand to lose £200?! Apologies if I have misunderstood your answer!

    Regarding the NU being one of the biggest insurance companies in Europe, with the present climate allowing short-selling traders to bring previously regarded safe institutions to their knees, should we not rule out even the most unlikely scenarios?
    stay lucky!
    Steve.
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 121,360 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Could I just clarify your point of 90% of the first £2k being guaranteed by the government and 100% of the rest.
    The FSCS is not Govt funded.
    If, for e.g, I invested £100k in the gift trust and in the (hopefully very unlikely!) event of the NU going under, I would only stand to lose £200?! Apologies if I have misunderstood your answer!
    sorry, that was a typo. Its the other way round. I have written it out so many times in the last week that I was almost on auto pilot. Its 100% of first £2000 and 90% of the rest. So, on £100k, £9800 would be the amount lost. However, it wouldnt be that because NU portfolio bonds give you an allocation of around 107% on £100k. So, your value from day one would be £107,000. £2000 of that protected 100% and 94,500 being the 90%. Meaning you only stand to lose £3500.

    The protection is based on the daily value not the amount you invest.
    should we not rule out even the most unlikely scenarios?
    If Norwich Union fail then we will have far worse things to worry about as to whether you will get your money back or not. UK insurers had to increase their solvency requirements after Equitable life. That has made them able to withstand problems like this much better than the banks. Plus, whilst they have some exposure to the areas involved, they are not as heavy into it as the banks are.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • Thanks again for your help in clarifying the matter
    stay lucky!
    Steve.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.