We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Voluntary Termination
Comments
-
They have breached the Data Protection Act. Not sure what the penalty is for that - might be worth about £400 don't you think? Did your copy of the CCA have all the required prescribed terms on it?After falling off the gambling wagon (twice): £33,600 (24,000+ 9,600) - Original CC Debt: £7,885.91
Dad Gift 6k ¦ Savings & Inv Tst: £2,500
Loan 10k: £0 ¦ Dad 5.5k: £2,270 ¦ LTSB: £0 ¦ RBS: £0 ¦ Virgin £0 ¦ Egg £0
Total Owed: £2,270 (+6k) 11/08/20110 -
I am not sure just looks like a CCA to meThey have breached the Data Protection Act. Not sure what the penalty is for that - might be worth about £400 don't you think? Did your copy of the CCA have all the required prescribed terms on it?
I would love to know what the penalty for Data protection breach is lol0 -
Hi All,
I am sending my car back under the V.T rules to welcome Finance today I had a guy come to do an inspection from the RAC on behalf of the finance company his findings were:-
Stone chips to Front Bumper
stone chips to Bonnet
Scratch to nsr wing( This scratch was on the car when I originally purchased the car)
I bought the car 2 yaers ago with 96,000 Miles on the clock it hass now done 113,000 MIles and the car is in better condition now that when I bought it.
I have Full Audi service history wirth the car & surely a car with this mileage on it is expected to have this type of stone chip damage as i accepted it at 96,000 Miles with stone chip damage.
The RA man asked me to sign for the damage which i refused to do so as I would be agreeing to paying the £500 to rectify the damage he quoted.
They are having a laugh surely,
Simon
From what you describe it is just fair wear and tear - particularly on a vehicle with that mileage when you bought it.
They are just trying to mitigate their losses - but at your expense.
You did right not to acknowledge damage by not signing the appraisal.
Stand firm - they may bluff and bluster but I don't think they will take it further as they will know they are being unreasonable - but they do it because some people will just pay up resulting in lesser losses to the them, the Finance company.0 -
standupguy wrote: »From what you describe it is just fair wear and tear - particularly on a vehicle with that mileage when you bought it.
They are just trying to mitigate their losses - but at your expense.
You did right not to acknowledge damage by not signing the appraisal.
Stand firm - they may bluff and bluster but I don't think they will take it further as they will know they are being unreasonable - but they do it because some people will just pay up resulting in lesser losses to the them, the Finance company.
Many Thanks,
I will stand firm
Simon0 -
I took the car to a local Bodyshop today to ask their advice they looked at my car and said that there was nothing wrong with it & they felt that the RAC were taking the p**s. They are putting there findings in writing for me nothing is on the car that is not normal wear and tear,in fact they did sday that it was in really good condition considering the mileage
Simon0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.7K Spending & Discounts
- 246K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.8K Life & Family
- 259.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards