We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Fed Has Run Out Of Money !!!!!!!
Comments
-
The Fed and Treasury need to tread very carefully here. At the moment, US short term T-Bill rates are at their lowest since Pearl Harbor (0.02% yesterday at one point) but if they keep this up the bond vigilantes will be out in force.
Bring back Paul Volcker.
Even an "easy money" policy which led to negative T-bill rates in 1933 did not prevent deflation.
The markets can withhold a trillion dollars faster than the US Government can print it. Any determined inflationary policy that really spooks the markets will see holders of US Treasuries dump them.
There won't be any helicopter money. Turning on the presses at high speed destroys more wealth than it creates. They can create liquidity by creating debt, but that isn't the same as creating capital. We've already had seen the US does have a limit in letting Lehman go to it's fate.0 -
Even an "easy money" policy which led to negative T-bill rates in 1933 did not prevent deflation.
The markets can withhold a trillion dollars faster than the US Government can print it. Any determined inflationary policy that really spooks the markets will see holders of US Treasuries dump them.
There won't be any helicopter money. Turning on the presses at high speed destroys more wealth than it creates. They can create liquidity by creating debt, but that isn't the same as creating capital. We've already had seen the US does have a limit in letting Lehman go to it's fate.
I agree wholeheartedly. Of course we're not quite at 1933 levels of desperation yet. Maybe we'll get there, maybe we won't.
Of course if the US had nationalised Lehmans then the 'implicit guarantee' would have moved over to the US investment banks and in an election year there are better (as in more vote winning) ways to spend money than on investment bankers.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.4K Spending & Discounts
- 243.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.7K Life & Family
- 256.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards