We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Am I being bullied by my broker?
louzoo
Posts: 2 Newbie
First time buyer in 2006 recommended decreasing life assurance through norwich union. Have been paying regularly but in review of finances found a better policy - level term and used trust for kids so cancelled other policy. According to my broker I should not have done this for 4 years and now unless I go back to Norwich Union or take out another policy via them they say we owe them £600. I agree I understood that we were not charged a fee as they got their commision for a product, but we were unaware of this four year rule and feel bullied. The people who recommended the new policy have said that I should not have to pay it back and it is a form of bullying but I am not sure where I stand legally and how to stand my ground. Anyone been through this? (I should add that in 2006 we purchased a repossed property and so everything had to be completed in 28 days so were we niave or ill advised?)
0
Comments
-
If you agreed a fee for the transaction and the commission was being used to offset the fee then this is correct.ccording to my broker I should not have done this for 4 years and now unless I go back to Norwich Union or take out another policy via them they say we owe them £600.
Ask for a copy of the fee agreement that shows you agreed to pay this.I agree I understood that we were not charged a fee as they got their commision for a product, but we were unaware of this four year rule and feel bullied.
The new company is wrong to say that as you may have a liability if a fee agreement exists. However, if no fee agreement exists then you do not.The people who recommended the new policy have said that I should not have to pay it back and it is a form of bullying but I am not sure where I stand legally and how to stand my ground.
Depends on the terms you agreed with the adviser. If on customer agreed remuneration then it can be a lot cheaper that way than pure commission. However there are some sales reps that abuse this system to scare you into paying their commission if clawed back which they are not allowed to do unless it was part of the remuneration agreement. Even if you did agree on fee basis with commission offset then they are only able to claim back the difference between what they have received to date and what is outstanding. i.e. if they have had £400 already and the agreement was £600 then they can only ask for £200.so were we niave or ill advised?I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455K Spending & Discounts
- 246.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178K Life & Family
- 260.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards