We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Domestic Nightmare finance dilemma!!!

13»

Comments

  • Just a word of caution -having seen a similar scenario at work recently - one of the couple ran up substantial debts so that a creditor took out a charging order against the property. The creditor would not give permission to discharge the additional charge over the property (which held up exchange of contracts) until the undertaking was forthcoming. The split therefore was not 50/50 and the bulk of the equity went to settle the debt of the one partner who actually had contributed the least.

    Agree with the majority of your post, but have to add that, afaik, the fact that property is owned as tenants in common rather than joint tenants will mean that any lender would only be able to secure a charge against the partner's 50% share rather than the whole house. Add the fact that they are not married and things may be better on this aspect than it might appear.

    As has already been said, take steps to dis-associate yourself from your ex financially. Cut her off financially close all joint accounts and consider adding a notice of disassociation to your credit file.

    As expensive at it may appear at first, the best option is to get a solicitor involved as it could save money in the long run.

    I have a customer/friend who was in a remarkably similar position and (against my advice and that of the remortgage solicitor who did the transfer of equity) decided to DIY a private agreement "to keep things amicable."

    Not only did he end up giving her all she wanted to buy her out of the equity she did not contribute to, he also ended up having to settle some joint debts that they had agreed she would pay from her share. She has now returned a year later and is accusing him of ripping her off (I know the figures involved so know he did not) and threatening him with all sorts of action if he does not cough up another £20k because she believes he deliberately undervalued the house as part of the remortgage.

    Whether she will be legally able to do anything or not, it still adds to the hassle and stress and he is having to employ a solicitor now just to check out what the position is.

    It will be tempting to see solicitors as an unneccesary expense but they offer a lot of security in this kind of situation.

    Good Luck
    I am an IFA (and boss o' t'swings idst)
    You should note that this site doesn't check my status as an IFA, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.
  • Generali
    Generali Posts: 36,411 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    It will be tempting to see solicitors as an unneccesary expense but they offer a lot of security in this kind of situation.

    Better to hate paying the lawyers when you get the bill than to regret not getting them each time you open your bank statement!
  • jayoh
    jayoh Posts: 33 Forumite
    I agree with most people here: I would aim to sell up, split the profits and start a new life where she has no claim over anything of yours.

    Incidentally, she has no claim over anything other than the house you share anyway so on this score you have been very forgiving! If she doesn't want you she can't want what you have either!!

    As others have said, make a note of how many months you have solely been paying the mortgage and go to a good family solicitor
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.