We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Minimum payments
bunking_off
Posts: 1,264 Forumite
Has anyone drawn up a table of the minimum monthly payments that each 0% card asks for?
I've noticed that these vary dramatically - Virgin (MBNA) seem to be happy with a fiver, whereas for a similar stooze pot the likes of Mint are wanting £100+ to be repaid per month.
Was playing with the figures yesterday, and noticed that for my particular circumstance (tending to BT £10k at a go, net gain is the 5.6% I save on my mortgage), for a 9 month BT this element is actually more material than whether there's a BT fee payable.
-For the cards which charge a BT fee, typically I have to pay the £50 cap, ie 0.5% of the stooze pot.
-For cards requiring larger minimum repayments, that can be 5% per month, meaning that by month 9 my stooze pot's only 66% the size of what it started life as.
The figures for the overall gain work out at a net gain of 3.4% with no BT but 5% minimum payment, 3.6% with a £50 fee but only a fiver repayment.
(Incidentally, on a 6 month BT the tables are turned at 2.4%/2.3% respectively)
I've noticed that these vary dramatically - Virgin (MBNA) seem to be happy with a fiver, whereas for a similar stooze pot the likes of Mint are wanting £100+ to be repaid per month.
Was playing with the figures yesterday, and noticed that for my particular circumstance (tending to BT £10k at a go, net gain is the 5.6% I save on my mortgage), for a 9 month BT this element is actually more material than whether there's a BT fee payable.
-For the cards which charge a BT fee, typically I have to pay the £50 cap, ie 0.5% of the stooze pot.
-For cards requiring larger minimum repayments, that can be 5% per month, meaning that by month 9 my stooze pot's only 66% the size of what it started life as.
The figures for the overall gain work out at a net gain of 3.4% with no BT but 5% minimum payment, 3.6% with a £50 fee but only a fiver repayment.
(Incidentally, on a 6 month BT the tables are turned at 2.4%/2.3% respectively)
I really must stop loafing and get back to work...
0
Comments
-
The only one that I'm aware of is at https://www.stoozing.com/0fees.htmbunking_off wrote:Has anyone drawn up a table of the minimum monthly payments that each 0% card asks for?0 -
Thanks YorkshireBoy...that's useful but doesn't go into the degree of detail I was after. E.g. both Virgin & Mint are marked as 2.25%. However, the issue is 2.25% of what - there's nuances e.g. Virgin is actually the lesser of 2.25% or "interests & fees" plus £5. As a real example of the difference it makes, my Virgin card is at approx £10k and I have to pay £5, Mint £6500 and I have to pay £144.
I'd actually got my earlier analysis slightly out, because I was thinking back to the old days when some cards had minimum repayments of 5%. At 2.25%, it works out that a card charging £50 for a BT then wanting only £5/month repayment works out pretty much identical to a card not charging a fee then wanting 2.25%/month minimum repayment (for a £10k stooze, for my particular circumstances - yours will vary according to what benefit you get from your stooze pot)I really must stop loafing and get back to work...0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards