We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Minimum payments

Has anyone drawn up a table of the minimum monthly payments that each 0% card asks for?

I've noticed that these vary dramatically - Virgin (MBNA) seem to be happy with a fiver, whereas for a similar stooze pot the likes of Mint are wanting £100+ to be repaid per month.

Was playing with the figures yesterday, and noticed that for my particular circumstance (tending to BT £10k at a go, net gain is the 5.6% I save on my mortgage), for a 9 month BT this element is actually more material than whether there's a BT fee payable.

-For the cards which charge a BT fee, typically I have to pay the £50 cap, ie 0.5% of the stooze pot.
-For cards requiring larger minimum repayments, that can be 5% per month, meaning that by month 9 my stooze pot's only 66% the size of what it started life as.

The figures for the overall gain work out at a net gain of 3.4% with no BT but 5% minimum payment, 3.6% with a £50 fee but only a fiver repayment.


(Incidentally, on a 6 month BT the tables are turned at 2.4%/2.3% respectively)
I really must stop loafing and get back to work...

Comments

  • YorkshireBoy
    YorkshireBoy Posts: 31,541 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Has anyone drawn up a table of the minimum monthly payments that each 0% card asks for?
    The only one that I'm aware of is at https://www.stoozing.com/0fees.htm
  • Thanks YorkshireBoy...that's useful but doesn't go into the degree of detail I was after. E.g. both Virgin & Mint are marked as 2.25%. However, the issue is 2.25% of what - there's nuances e.g. Virgin is actually the lesser of 2.25% or "interests & fees" plus £5. As a real example of the difference it makes, my Virgin card is at approx £10k and I have to pay £5, Mint £6500 and I have to pay £144.

    I'd actually got my earlier analysis slightly out, because I was thinking back to the old days when some cards had minimum repayments of 5%. At 2.25%, it works out that a card charging £50 for a BT then wanting only £5/month repayment works out pretty much identical to a card not charging a fee then wanting 2.25%/month minimum repayment (for a £10k stooze, for my particular circumstances - yours will vary according to what benefit you get from your stooze pot)
    I really must stop loafing and get back to work...
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.