We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Cheap "guaranteed" pension

EdInvestor
Posts: 15,749 Forumite
New pension plan has a third of the money in cash, a third in a fund linked to house prices and a third in a stockmarket fund organised like a GEB.
It features very low charges. Capital is guaranteed.
Sunday Telegraph
It features very low charges. Capital is guaranteed.
Sunday Telegraph
Trying to keep it simple...

0
Comments
-
Just had a quick read of the article. The 3rd of the fund that is linked to the FTSE 100, does not include dividends, so you miss out on that, which makes up a lot of the annual growth of the Stock market.
So maybe not that good for younger people, but maybe worth it for older people nearing retirement who are looking for a guarantee.
Steve2014 running challenge 587.4 miles / 250 miles0 -
Hello, Edinvestor
It's every bit as bad as a Guaranteed Equity Bond - I wouldn't touch it with a bargepole! And how can they call it a pension when it has a term of ten years? What happens when the investment matures? Who would keep one third of their long term investment in cash ? The worst thing is the quote from the company who came up with this scheme
"PS&I said back-testing of the Lifetime Account had shown that, at the very worst, investors would have doubled their money over 10 years. The best return was 164 per cent. "
Back testing is a very unreliable method of predicting future returns, and a responsible investment house would not use it to promote a fund.
Back to the SIPP, I'm afraid :-)
Cheerfulcat0 -
It doesn't look very appealing.
Charges are irrelevant really as they are not making an annual management charge but not giving you the dividends. Its just a different way of taking a charge. In the same way a savings account doesnt make a charge, it doesnt mean there isnt one. (i.e. money markets/loans gives them 10%, they pay the savers 6% so that gives an indirect 4% charge).
Also, how can a lifetime account only last for 10 years? Seems a bit of a contradiction to me.
If you want that sort of investment mix, then stick 33% in a tracker, 33% in a property fund and 33% in gilts/fixed interest/corp bond funds and get all the income from it rather than this company keeping it for themselves.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
What a terrible product!
Anyone know what the dividend yield on the FTSE 100 is? 4% or so? Doesn't that make this a product with an annual charge equivalent to about 1.2%?0 -
New pension plan has a third of the money in cash, a third in a fund linked to house prices and a third in a stockmarket fund organised like a GEB.
It features very low charges. Capital is guaranteed.
IMHO you would be better in a low cost SIPP0 -
whiteflag wrote:IMHO you would be better in a low cost SIPP
You're right, Whiteflag, I am convinced EdInvestor should consider a low-cost SIPP. Do you know of anyone who has any details?oceanblue is a Chartered Financial Planner.
Anything posted is for discussion only. It should not be taken to represent financial advice. Different people have different needs, and what is right for one person may not be right for another. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser; he or she will be able to advise you after having found out more about your own circumstances.0 -
Rofl...I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0
-
whiteflag wrote:IMHO you would be better in a low cost SIPP
I think you could be right whiteflag.The charges would be a lower for a start.Trying to keep it simple...0 -
EdInvestor wrote:I think you could be right whiteflag.The charges would be a lower for a start.
So what was the motivation for your original post?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards