We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
mobiles and driving

DONTKNOWWHATTODO_4
Posts: 15 Forumite
in Motoring
Is it an offence to hold your mobile phone but not actually use it whilst driving?
0
Comments
-
It is a specific offence to use a hand-held phone when driving. A hand-held device is something that “is or must be held at some point during the course of making or receiving a call or performing any other interactive communication function.” A motorist can regard driving as meaning a vehicle with the engine running. In simple terms you can use a mobile as long as you don’t hold the phone and you can’t use a hand-held phone if the engine is running.
Can I use a hands-free phone while I’m driving?
Yes, but you can only use it if it can be operated without holding the phone. Therefore mobile phones should be placed in cradles which are attached to the dashboard. Pushing buttons is permissibleEx forum ambassador
Long term forum member0 -
DONTKNOWWHATTODO wrote: »Is it an offence to hold your mobile phone but not actually use it whilst driving?(6) For the purposes of this regulation -So, on a strict interpretation of the above, just holding the phone and letting it ring is not an interactive communication, and doesn't breach the law.
(a) a mobile telephone or other device is to be treated as hand-held if it is, or must be, held at some point during the course of making or receiving a call or performing any other interactive communication function;
...
(c) "interactive communication function" includes the following:
(i) sending or receiving oral or written messages;
(ii) sending or receiving facsimile documents;
(iii) sending or receiving still or moving images; and
(iv) providing access to the internet;
But, as we've seen from cases that have come before Magistrates, the interpretation from most benches is that if you touch the phone for any reason, you have broken the law and are guilty.
What's actually needed is a test case to go to the High Court so that a clear ruling can be made, to sort out the rather ambiguous way this legislation has been drafted.
I have been providing assistance, including Lay Representation at Court hearings (current score: won 57, lost 14), to defendants in parking cases for over 5 years. I have an LLB (Hons) degree, and have a Graduate Diploma in Civil Litigation from CILEx. However, any advice given on these forums by me is NOT formal legal advice, and I accept no liability for its accuracy.0 -
The actual legislation relating to this states as follows:(6) For the purposes of this regulation -So, on a strict interpretation of the above, just holding the phone and letting it ring is not an interactive communication, and doesn't breach the law.
(a) a mobile telephone or other device is to be treated as hand-held if it is, or must be, held at some point during the course of making or receiving a call or performing any other interactive communication function;
...
(c) "interactive communication function" includes the following:
(i) sending or receiving oral or written messages;
(ii) sending or receiving facsimile documents;
(iii) sending or receiving still or moving images; and
(iv) providing access to the internet;
But, as we've seen from cases that have come before Magistrates, the interpretation from most benches is that if you touch the phone for any reason, you have broken the law and are guilty.
What's actually needed is a test case to go to the High Court so that a clear ruling can be made, to sort out the rather ambiguous way this legislation has been drafted.
No, I disagree. I think it's already quite clear. The section of the statute that you quote is only the part of the statute that defines what 'hand held' means. As the OP admits that the device was a mobile phone then we need not be concerned with that section.
The actual offence is:
" Mobile telephones
110. - (1) No person shall drive a motor vehicle on a road if he is using -
(a) a hand-held mobile telephone; or
(b) a hand-held device of a kind specified in paragraph (4)."
So it's clear that the OP is guilty of the offence. He was driving a motor vehicle on a road whilst using a hand-held mobile telephone. He was 'using' it because he was presumably holding it in order to see who was calling. Those functions listed in your post are not the only functions that constitute 'use' of the device.0 -
Why hold it if you have no intention of using it??
Guilty..Genie
Master Technician0 -
Well, clearly, even thinking about using a phone is a crime.Happy chappy0
-
tomstickland wrote: »Well, clearly, even thinking about using a phone is a crime.
But on a serious note... if you are driving, why hold it? If you are spotted holding it - then it would look like you are about to use, are using it or have been using it whilst driving!
Just put the damn thing in your pocket or somewhere and then you don't have a problem.......... or is that too simple??Genie
Master Technician0 -
jeannieblue wrote: »But on a serious note... if you are driving, why hold it?
Maybe it has a leather pouch...
Mmmm leather, stroke, stroke, leather mmmm.
Crash.0 -
bluetooth stereos are the way ahead,seriously consider one,well worth it and pretty cheap these days....work permit granted!0
-
I wonder if the OP was holding it near to their ear?;)0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 348.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 452.5K Spending & Discounts
- 241.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 617.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 175.8K Life & Family
- 254.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards