We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Wholesale gas prices have collapsed!!!

124»

Comments

  • Milarky
    Milarky Posts: 6,356 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic
    On the subject of a possible 'windfall tax' on the utility companies, how is that going to address the question of higher individual (and average) consumer bills?

    This 'blah-di-blah' about 'fuel poverty' doesn't ring any bells with me. I can see how the government could 'decree' an increase in winter fuel payments (targeting 'average' bills) this year but that is just sticking plaster since only certain groups get these payments - but everyone gets roughly the same fuel charges.

    There is a case (or sorts) that the energy companies have enjoyed a 'windfall' courtesy of not having to pay for tradeable emission permits for a number of years but from what I read that particular epispode is unlikely to be repeated as permits will have to be paid for after 2012. A windfall tax in the upswing of a boom - like 1997 - by a newly elected popular government sitting on healthy tax revenues is one thing; a windfall tax imposed by a fiscally busted (and hugely unpopular) one is another. Could the windfall tax idea just be a smokescreen to meaningful action in this area?

    Why not just pass a law giving every consumer so many 'free' (or discounted) units/therms, and them allowing a 'free' market in prices for consumption above this? Is Europe stopping such a direct method of dealing with fuel poverty? At present, utility companies charge a differential price equivalent to the standing charge for the initial units - but making subsequent units progressively dearer simply reproduces the concept of a progressive income tax. If progressive income tax is considered necessary in a decent society then why hasn't (controlled) 'progressive pricing' been tried?
    .....under construction.... COVID is a [discontinued] scam
  • StevieJ
    StevieJ Posts: 20,174 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Gas commodity prices down 8% again today, oil also falls below $120 during the day.
    'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher
  • cepheus
    cepheus Posts: 20,053 Forumite
    Milarky wrote: »
    T

    Why not just pass a law giving every consumer so many 'free' (or discounted) units/therms, and them allowing a 'free' market in prices for consumption above this? Is Europe stopping such a direct method of dealing with fuel poverty? At present, utility companies charge a differential price equivalent to the standing charge for the initial units - but making subsequent units progressively dearer simply reproduces the concept of a progressive income tax. If progressive income tax is considered necessary in a decent society then why hasn't (controlled) 'progressive pricing' been tried?


    Quite, it shows how committed these companies are to reducing energy use when they make it cheaper the more we use. It would make it confusing for old and vunerable people though. I would like a progressive tax as you say, but also a interest free grant for insulation, the cost of which is gradually taken from the energy bill. Both these would encourage energy conservation.
  • Gas has followed the Crude Oil price and commodity's have strengthened mainly due to the weakness in the $. If this link continues then the $ is probably at the start of a recovery cycle so this should at least have put a top on oil and gas prices. Oil is currently down $2 so far today.
  • Kimitatsu
    Kimitatsu Posts: 3,883 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Oil and gas prices are down but it is August not February.

    Most of us do not have any heating on at this time of year, we dont have the lights on for as long and cooking a hot meal every day is not always important.

    In the winter when we have heating lighting cooking costs then the spot price of gas goes up which is passed on to the consumer. If you want accurate data then look at the wholesale gas price over a 12 month period rather than just three weeks of the summer, and compare it to thix year. You will find that the cycles follow a similar pattern, with gas and oil being more expensive throughout the winter months.
    Free/impartial debt advice: Consumer Credit Counselling Service (CCCS) | National Debtline | Find your local CAB
  • how soon will it be before the gas co's are forced (by public, or govt) pressure to bring prices down in line with wholesale (their main reason for hiking prices!) , or at least reverse the recent devastating rises?
  • Kimitatsu
    Kimitatsu Posts: 3,883 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    The government cannot force the gas co's to lower their prices as they are privately owned - they are owned by their shareholders. The only thing the govt can do is impose a windfall tax which will not benefit the consumer in any way.
    Free/impartial debt advice: Consumer Credit Counselling Service (CCCS) | National Debtline | Find your local CAB
  • BexTech
    BexTech Posts: 4,772 Forumite
    amcluesent wrote: »
    >I feel sorry for the CAP THEM NOW crew<

    Well that depends. I made a 'mistake' in my readings of the meters, so pre-paid for a few months of consumption at the old-tariff. My capped tariff has no exit penalty, so if it pays me, I'll just go back with no harm done.

    Same here, we made the same mistake, however we only capped the electricity as there was virtually nothing in it compared to the cheap tariff we were already on, a few pound over the year - so would have been stupid not to cap.

    However we haven't capped the gas, as that was double figure %-age increase difference. We will ride that one out and we can more easily reduce gas usage than electricity usage.

    There is no exit fee on our capped tariff, so it's a win - win option.
    It's PAC not PAC Code, it's MAC not MAC Code, it's PIN not PIN Number, it's ATM not ATM Machine, it's LCD not LCD Display, it's DVD not DVD disc... It's no one not noone, It's a lot not alot, It's got not gotten... Panini is the plural of panino - there is no S!!
    (OK my English isn't great, the sciences, maths & IT are my strong points!)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.