Shorter Mortgage Term?

251 Posts
Hello there,
I was hoping to get your thoughts/general advice on something, please!
I'm a FTB, hoping to buy somewhere in mid-2009 once my partner and I have a healthy deposit saved (approx £25k=10%).
I was having a look at the Nationwide mortgage calculator and it seems that £250k:
Over 25 years, payments on a 3 yr fixed deal would be approx £1700
Over 12 years, payments on a 3 yr fixed deal would be approx £2500
My thoughts are if we can afford to pay more over a shorter term, we'd be doing ourselves a favour when it comes to remortgaging at the end of Yr 3?
We'll be turning 30 when we buy, so we're concious of being able to build up a decent amount of equity and the intention is to buy somewhere that will do us for a few years, allow us to have a family and then either extend or upgrade when the kids are a bit bigger (all completely hypothetical at the mo!).
My thinking is is that if we did need to free up some cash after Yr 3, we'd be able to remortgage for a longer period and (depending on interest rates) have lower monthly payments? Or if we found this amount to be manageable, stick to the shorter-term and be mortgage free by mid-40's?
Is this realistic? Is it worth stretching ourselves? Will the shorter term be worth it in the long run?
Any advice or guidance welcome.
Thanks
Also posted in the general mortgage thread
I was hoping to get your thoughts/general advice on something, please!
I'm a FTB, hoping to buy somewhere in mid-2009 once my partner and I have a healthy deposit saved (approx £25k=10%).
I was having a look at the Nationwide mortgage calculator and it seems that £250k:
Over 25 years, payments on a 3 yr fixed deal would be approx £1700
Over 12 years, payments on a 3 yr fixed deal would be approx £2500
My thoughts are if we can afford to pay more over a shorter term, we'd be doing ourselves a favour when it comes to remortgaging at the end of Yr 3?
We'll be turning 30 when we buy, so we're concious of being able to build up a decent amount of equity and the intention is to buy somewhere that will do us for a few years, allow us to have a family and then either extend or upgrade when the kids are a bit bigger (all completely hypothetical at the mo!).
My thinking is is that if we did need to free up some cash after Yr 3, we'd be able to remortgage for a longer period and (depending on interest rates) have lower monthly payments? Or if we found this amount to be manageable, stick to the shorter-term and be mortgage free by mid-40's?
Is this realistic? Is it worth stretching ourselves? Will the shorter term be worth it in the long run?
Any advice or guidance welcome.
Thanks

Also posted in the general mortgage thread
0
This discussion has been closed.
Latest MSE News and Guides
Replies
Ultimatly your home is at risk if you cannot maintain repayments. Overpaying should give you similar results to taking a mortgage out over a shorter term provided there is no penalties for overpayment
Some accounts will automatically lower your repayments when you overpay, so you can just set up a standing order for the higher amount to top up the mortgage payment. This makes you fully in control, allowing you to reduce if times get harder without overcommitting.
In addition, if you could this overpayment strategy with an endowment or associated savings account, it will further cushion you and allow you to make choices sooner than if you were simply burying money into your mortgage as it allows you to access the savings in an emergency, but use the interest to reduce your mortgage interest paid.
Ultimately it depends on what you are really looking for. When I overpaid my mortgage and had an associated endowment, it was choices.
We decided to remortgage a couple of years ago with the intention of paying off the remaining mortgage ASAP. I looked into shortening the term, but kept it the same as we didn't want to feel tied into paying the extra amount every month.
In your position, I'd look into something fairly flexible that will allow you to overpay as much as you wish. That way, if you have extra money one month you can pay it in, but similarly if you are having a tight month once in a while you can just pay your normal payment.
There were a lot of discussions on Nationwider trackers and overpayments... if you go in with a tracker for 30 years say the gist seemed to be that although overpayments weren't allowed, changing your term as much as you wanted was, so people were phoning up one month and saying I'd like my term to be 4 years in order to make the level of overpayment they wanted then putting it back up to 25 say the next.... fixed deals seem fairly pricey with fees at the moment so perhaps a tracker worth considering?
It does indeed seem that overpayments will be the way to go - giving us the flexibility to overpay when we can, rather than being tied in to high payments... I'm definitely keen to do this, and feel massively inspired by you MFWs on here. I'm liking the idea of this muchly