We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Buying a repossession

2»

Comments

  • havethis1 wrote: »
    I think you only need PP for a loft if your classing it as a bedroom rather than just a room

    No - that's irrelevant.
    silvercar wrote: »
    AFAIK, the enforcement notice is on the property, so whoever owns it will be liable for the costs of complying.

    One way of complying may be to apply for retrospective planning permission and completing the work to an acceptable standard. Of course if you failed to get planning permission (and it needed it) you would have the cost of removing the loft room.

    (Still assuming that the loft room is the bugbear, why not phone the council and ask them?)

    I would have thought it's the dormers that are the issue. However, it may not be as simple as applying for retrospective planning permission - basically, Councils are only supposed to use enforcement notices to rectify breaches of planning control that are causing harm - they're not served willy nilly to anything without permission. If the unauthorised development is causing no harm it probably wouldn't have caused an enforcement notice to be served! Therefore, whatever it is that is the subject of the EN is likely to be objectionable for some reason in planning terms - maybe it's the design, or perhaps overlooking to neighbours?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.