PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Sitting tenant - regulated tenancy question/views????

Options
13»

Comments

  • rrwfotr
    rrwfotr Posts: 573 Forumite
    General rule of thumb, to which I'm quite open to correction, is that a property with a sitting tenant will be worth around 50% of open market value.

    So if you think you are buying it for about half price, its actually about market value. Don't forget that regulated tenancies can also be passed on to dependents, so if the 80 year old tenant has a 40 year old kid living with them, dont assume that the tenancy will be given up anywhere before 2050!

    p.s. its not going to be 'quite difficult' to evict the tenant. Its a lot safer to assume its going to be impossible!


    Thanks do the dependants have to be living in the property with the tennant? Or can they pass it on when they want etc ....
  • rrwfotr wrote:
    Thanks do the dependants have to be living in the property with the tennant? Or can they pass it on when they want etc ....

    I think that they have had to have been living in the property at some time, but as to the actual rules I don't know. If you are seriously considering this route, you will need advice from a lawyer specialising in this area, as if you get it wrong you could end up with a low rent and no possession, with the obligation to do repairs and upgrades to the property for 40 years!

    IN terms of risk, this appears to me to be a worse investment than you going to the bookies and putting all your spare cash on the nose of the second favourite in the 2.45 at Plumpton today.
    I can spell - but I can't type
  • rrwfotr
    rrwfotr Posts: 573 Forumite
    Yep I think the key thing here is the do your homework first and then look into these these sort of properties. Def not one for a first time buyer. Thanks for all your input chaps!!!
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.