We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Tax on selling rental house

2»

Comments

  • terryw
    terryw Posts: 4,396 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Combo Breaker
    Tate65 wrote: »
    Thanks for that, Terry!

    A couple of questions, though: What's PPR, and do you know what would the tax rate be?
    Oops sorry....missed out

    PPR is principal private residence

    terryw
    "If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken
    Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools"
    Extract from "If" by Rudyard Kipling
  • silvercar
    silvercar Posts: 50,864 Ambassador
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Academoney Grad Name Dropper
    Tate65 wrote: »
    I'm not at all sure about the tax implications of selling a house that we used to live in but have been renting out for the last year and a bit, so hoped somebody could help.

    Using simple(ish) numbers - if we lived in the house for 5 years, rented it out for 1 year then sold my understanding is that there's no tax payable on the increase in the value of the house, as you can add a couple of years on to the time you lived there as a tax-free period.

    But, if we kept it for another 4 years then sold - so we'd lived there for 5 years and rented it out for 5 years - what sort of level of tax could we expect to pay? Some of the increase in value would, I believe, be taxable - so how much and at what level of tax?

    You are exempt from CGT for the time it was your home and the last 3 years of ownership. So if the rental period was totally contained within the last 3 years, there would be no tax to pay.

    If you owned it for 8 years and had rented it out (early on) for one year, you would be liable for tax on one-eighth of the gain less buying, selling and improvement costs. If you owned it for 20 years and had rented it out for 2 years (not in the last 3 years of ownership) you would be liable for tax on two-twentieths = one- tenth of the gain.

    You also get letting relief, worth a maximum of £40,000. This is restricted to the minimum of the amount of relief you get for the time it was your home, the gain while it was let and £40,000.

    From this liability you take off your CGT allowance of £9,600 per person, so joint owners get £9,600 each.

    Anything remaining would be taxed at 18%.
    I'm a Forum Ambassador on the housing, mortgages & student money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.
  • Tate65
    Tate65 Posts: 89 Forumite
    Thanks everyone - that's been very helpful!

    Hopon - ah, that was it then. I'd previously read up on this but then heard them doing something in the budget that I wasn't sure how it would affect things, and I think that was the taper relief being removed. If it's just that then it's not so bad (in our situation) as the other reliefs cover us. So long as they don't remove them too at some point!

    One other question out of interest, in case any of you know - if the CGT relief is £9.6k per person, do both people need to have owned the house from the start?

    I just ask as the house was my wife's and is still just in her name. If we did end up keeping it for the long term and found that we were heading into CGT when we sold, would it be possible to move it into both of our names so my CGT allowance could also be utilised? Or would this be a complicated change of ownership thing?
  • silvercar
    silvercar Posts: 50,864 Ambassador
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Academoney Grad Name Dropper
    would it be possible to move it into both of our names so my CGT allowance could also be utilised?

    Yes. But make sure your solicitor understands that you want to transfer half before sale and not just receive half the sale proceeds.
    Or would this be a complicated change of ownership thing?

    It is a change of ownership, but it is not complicated. As you are married there is no CGT to pay on transfer and you are deemed to have acquired your share at the price and time your wife bought the property.
    One other question out of interest, in case any of you know - if the CGT relief is £9.6k per person, do both people need to have owned the house from the start?

    No. I presume you have also been living in the property as your PPR. If you have not lived in the property, you would not get PPR relief and the last 3 years, nor would you get letting relief.
    I'm a Forum Ambassador on the housing, mortgages & student money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.
  • Tate65
    Tate65 Posts: 89 Forumite
    silvercar wrote: »
    No. I presume you have also been living in the property as your PPR. If you have not lived in the property, you would not get PPR relief and the last 3 years, nor would you get letting relief.

    Not sure I fully understand what you mean there. My wife bought the house before I met her then I moved in to hers, having sold mine, for about 18 months before we bought our current house and rented hers out.

    So she'd lived there as her main residence from when she bought it until she rented it out, so I assume she'd get the PPR relief and letting relief.

    Would moving it into joint names affect those reliefs, if I'd not lived there from the start?
  • silvercar
    silvercar Posts: 50,864 Ambassador
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Academoney Grad Name Dropper
    Would moving it into joint names affect those reliefs, if I'd not lived there from the start?

    When you transfer between spouses the date and value are assumed to be that when the original owner bought. The eligibility for PPR and last 3 years concession and letting relief require you to have lived there as your PPR.

    So if you had never actually lived in the property and your wife transferred half to you before sale, you would not be eligible to letting relief. As you have lived there you will get letting relief and PPR for the time it was your home and the last 3 years of ownership.

    The problem arises when someone transfers half of what was their home to their new spouse when the new spouse has never lived there. They transfer with the intention of gaining another £9,600 CGT allowance and forget that they lose PPR relief and letting relief and so end up with a greater tax bill.
    I'm a Forum Ambassador on the housing, mortgages & student money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.
  • vaio
    vaio Posts: 12,287 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    I’m sure it hardly needs saying and I’m sure all the posters are absolutely right and giving you good advice but as there could be significant sums of money involved I think I’d be tempted to get it confirmed by someone professional before you act on it.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.