We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Best Of
-
Re: where can I position my curtain pole above the patio door [sorted]
Thanks to everyone who helped with this DIY. I would have used 4mm screws and messed it up 😁 Very pleased with it…. though the curtains didn't come with a tieback :/ …. so a job for another day1 -
Re: Google Pixel 8a battery problem?
I do that all the time, very easy to do. Extreme battery saver is great when you need it when you're down to 10%. Lasts for hours.1 -
Re: Google Pixel 8a battery problem?
You may have accidentally clicked the Quick Settings battery tile1 -
Re: Free bus travel 24/7 for disabled people
My grip is why April & not now. Add in many buses round here have a max of one or two wheelchair users. It is not going to get them rushing out to use buses, that often do not turn up & do no…1 -
Re: MSE NEWS: Aged 66+ with a health condition? Beware of paying to submit an Attendance Allowance claim
I used a company for my father's application as when I did my research the percentage of refusals for applications was around 60%! Just google it! The company I used were recommended by a neighb…1 -
Re: Defendant vs DCB Legal (for Parkmaven)
At any point during the booking, and that you can evidence, was a positive action made to express an interest in parking? Eg, ticking a box for, "will you require parking during your stay?"…1 -
Re: Defendant vs DCB Legal (for Parkmaven)
The court's order requires a defence that engages with the specific claim. An account of events is not, on its own, a defence. A defence connects the facts to legal principles that produce a res…2 -
Re: Defendant vs DCB Legal (for Parkmaven)
Paragraph 3 provided an explanation, like a WS, but doesn't not actually refute the POC details A typical basic paragraphs 3 is similar to the one in the thread below1 -
Re: Defendant vs DCB Legal (for Parkmaven)
You need to add some references to contract law in your P3 I suspect. The judge may have taken one look at the template and was annoyed by it (it does happen). Remember this is still going to be disc…1 -
Re: Defendant vs DCB Legal (for Parkmaven)
You need to edit that submitted defence above so that its clearly readable with line breaks between the paragraphs Because you used the template defence, we only needed to clearly see and read your p…1
