Maintenance Changes - Opinions Please!

Options
2»

Comments

  • unholyangel
    unholyangel Posts: 16,863 Forumite
    Name Dropper First Post First Anniversary
    edited 20 June 2017 at 11:48AM
    Options
    Does your ex actually realise she's being paid far more than you're required to?

    If she doesn't perhaps ask her to check for herself. You may find she's more amenable when she realises that she's entitled to less for 5 days than you're offering for the 4 days.

    I'd never recommend someone only pay the minimum - especially if they can afford more - as child maintenance works based on what you earn rather than the actual costs of raising the child. However it may also be worthwhile to point out to your ex that although you're willing to pay more than required, that payment doesn't have to be made via her - you could choose to set up an account for each of the children for when they're older or even just spend extra on them when they are at yours.

    ETA: I mean the above as a way of showing that you're being more than fair with her rather than as a way to blackmail her!
    You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride
  • FBaby
    FBaby Posts: 18,367 Forumite
    First Anniversary First Post Combo Breaker
    Options
    Assuming the maintenance you pay doesn't include an element towards the mortgage that remains joint then of course you are reasonable. What would be easier to comment on is her rationale why she thinks it isn't. Does she pay for childcare and would continue to do so even on the days they are with you, holidays? Does she pays all their activities school uniforms school trips etc...?
  • robeano
    Options
    Hi Everyone

    Thank you so much for your opinions. On the whole it feels like I'm not being completely unreasonable so I think I'll carry on with the proposed reduction. However, I really like the idea of phasing it over a couple of months to make sure my ex can adjust more easily.

    Thanks again Moneysavers - you're all wonderful!

    Rob
  • kingfisherblue
    kingfisherblue Posts: 9,203 Forumite
    Name Dropper First Anniversary First Post Xmas Saver!
    Options
    robeano wrote: »
    Hi Everyone

    Thank you so much for your opinions. On the whole it feels like I'm not being completely unreasonable so I think I'll carry on with the proposed reduction. However, I really like the idea of phasing it over a couple of months to make sure my ex can adjust more easily.

    Thanks again Moneysavers - you're all wonderful!

    Rob

    You sound like a very reasonable man, and thoughtful too.
  • Marvel1
    Marvel1 Posts: 7,172 Forumite
    Name Dropper First Post First Anniversary
    Options
    silvercar wrote: »
    If £800 represented her having them for 5/7ths of the week. That means £640 is equivalent to having them 4/7ths of the week.

    That is just on a pro-rata basis. In practical terms she still provides a home for them, can't rent out their rooms when they are not there, won't really buy them less clothes, may have a marginal drop in electricity and water and has to buy slightly less food. So I'm not convinced pro-rata is fair.

    So basically the same as OP then.
  • silvercar
    silvercar Posts: 46,965 Ambassador
    Academoney Grad Name Dropper Photogenic First Anniversary
    Options
    Guest101 wrote: »
    It's 4/7 vs 3/7, so really the amount to be paid should be 1/7, but I appreciate it doesn't work like that, bizarrely

    4/7 of one person's income won't be be 3/7 of the other, unless they earn identical amounts.
    I'm a Forum Ambassador on The Coronavirus Boards as well as the housing, mortgages and student money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.
  • Guest101
    Guest101 Posts: 15,764 Forumite
    Options
    silvercar wrote: »
    4/7 of one person's income won't be be 3/7 of the other, unless they earn identical amounts.



    Indeed, but that isn't what I meant.


    The cost of looking after children doesn't depend on income, it's more or less the same no matter which parent is doing it.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 343.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 250.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 449.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 235.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 608.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 173.1K Life & Family
  • 247.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards