Cyclist collision at mini round about
Options
Comments
-
At the scene he said he was fine and didnt want an ambulance called0
-
emmasaunders wrote: »This advice is echoed in Rule 167 of the Highway Code: ‘Do not overtake where you might come into conflict with other road users. For example, approaching or at a road junction on either side of the road’.
So basically don't ever overtake? Because in this country 90% of the time, overtaking causes conflict.“I may not agree with you, but I will defend to the death your right to make an a** of yourself.”
<><><><><><><><><<><><><><><><><><><><><><> Don't forget to like and subscribe \/ \/ \/0 -
particularly at a junction with no lights at dusk wearing black?0
-
emmasaunders wrote: »[a whole load of blame shifting]
Look, it doesn't matter what the cyclist did, or didn't, or should, or shouldn't, have done.
The fact is that you failed to see a cyclist until he actually hit you. Stop finding excuses and LEARN FROM IT.0 -
cant you realise that by analysing the situation I am LEARNING FROM IT
The cyclist was wrong - he broke the law - he didn't pay attention and I'm the person who will suffer because a car is bigger than a bike
May happen to you one day, wonder what yoru response will be then0 -
emmasaunders wrote: »cant you realise that by analysing the situation I am LEARNING FROM IT
The cyclist was wrong - he broke the law - he didn't pay attention and I'm the person who will suffer because a car is bigger than a bike
May happen to you one day, wonder what yoru response will be then
No, you're "learning" entirely the wrong thing. You're trying to find every reason you can to show that it was the cyclist's fault and that you were blameless. You're "learning" how to excuse yourself.
What you should be doing is thinking about and learning what you could do to avoid the next time regardless of what the other person is doing / not doing.
Take it from me - not from personal experience but I've known 2 or 3 it's happened to - when there's a dead and badly broken body in the road it really won't matter who was "in the wrong":- You will live with the guilt for a very long time indeed.
- You will have nightmares about it that won't go away.
- You likely will lose the freedom that driving gives because you won't be able to get behind the wheel.
If you don't suffer those effects if it ever happens then you're probably too psychopathic to be anywhere near a set of car keys.0 -
I already feel those things, but fail to believe that my driving fell below the standards of being a competent motorist, there is culpability on the cyclists part0
-
emmasaunders wrote: »At the scene he said he was fine and didnt want an ambulance called
You're avoiding the issue. The RTA makes no mention of ambulance.
I'll bet he has an injury so you should report it.0 -
emmasaunders wrote: »I already feel those things, but fail to believe that my driving fell below the standards of being a competent motorist, there is culpability on the cyclists part
And on you.
Would you have passed your test had this happened then?0 -
emmasaunders wrote: »even though he did not have lights was dressed in black and had no reflectors?
No.
That's like saying "It's not my fault I raped her she was dressed proactively".
How the cyclist was dressed is not relevant, you are responsible for looking.
I ride a motorbike, drivers like you terrify me. It's your responsibility to see me, not my responsibility to dress like a Christmas tree.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 343.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 250.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 449.7K Spending & Discounts
- 235.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 608.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 173.1K Life & Family
- 247.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards