PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING

Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.

Lily Allen may be homeless for Christmas

Options
13»

Comments

  • teddysmum
    teddysmum Posts: 9,474 Forumite
    First Anniversary Combo Breaker First Post
    Options
    The whole story is nonsense as the 'diplomat' is an Italian photographer who just asked for an extra two days' stay.
  • aneary
    aneary Posts: 921 Forumite
    Options
    According to the official website if you don't pay enforcement officers can be sent and they are certified by the county court no mention of a criminal offence?
  • Comms69
    Comms69 Posts: 14,229 Forumite
    Name Dropper First Anniversary First Post
    Options
    aneary wrote: »
    According to the official website if you don't pay enforcement officers can be sent and they are certified by the county court no mention of a criminal offence?



    Yes and no. It's complicated.


    I think it's comparable to the TV licence. (even in criminal courts, if a fine isn't paid, it can be sent to the county courts for enforcement, amongst lots of other things)
  • aneary
    aneary Posts: 921 Forumite
    Options
    Comms69 wrote: »
    Yes and no. It's complicated.


    I think it's comparable to the TV licence. (even in criminal courts, if a fine isn't paid, it can be sent to the county courts for enforcement, amongst lots of other things)

    It's been moved to civil.

    From the house of commons website
    1. THE SPARKS PROGRAMME

    1.1 The SPARKS Programme (Shared Parking and Registered Keeper information Service) is an initiative that enables traffic authorities in the UK and other EU Member States to collaborate and co-operate as they seek to resolve the issue of cross-border enforcement of civil traffic contraventions. The initiative is the creation of London's Enforcement Task Force, a pan-London grouping of organisations that co-ordinates traffic enforcement activities.
    1.2 The Enforcement Task Force comprises Transport for London, London Councils, London Technical Advisors Group (LoTAG), Metropolitan Police Service and City of London Police, as well as representatives from the Drivers and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) and the Vehicle and Operators Services Agency (VOSA).
    1.3 Civil enforcement—also sometimes called "decriminalised enforcement'—involves transferring the responsibility for enforcing road traffic regulations from the police to local government authorities. In the UK it also removes the penalty process from the jurisdiction of the criminal courts and transfers it to the civil arena. The result of the change from the criminal to the civil regime is an effective, computerised and automated process capable of processing high volumes of cases, but which fails when key elements, such as vehicle ownership data, are missing.
  • Comms69
    Comms69 Posts: 14,229 Forumite
    Name Dropper First Anniversary First Post
    Options
    aneary wrote: »
    It's been moved to civil.

    From the house of commons website
    1. THE SPARKS PROGRAMME

    1.1 The SPARKS Programme (Shared Parking and Registered Keeper information Service) is an initiative that enables traffic authorities in the UK and other EU Member States to collaborate and co-operate as they seek to resolve the issue of cross-border enforcement of civil traffic contraventions. The initiative is the creation of London's Enforcement Task Force, a pan-London grouping of organisations that co-ordinates traffic enforcement activities.
    1.2 The Enforcement Task Force comprises Transport for London, London Councils, London Technical Advisors Group (LoTAG), Metropolitan Police Service and City of London Police, as well as representatives from the Drivers and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) and the Vehicle and Operators Services Agency (VOSA).
    1.3 Civil enforcement—also sometimes called "decriminalised enforcement'—involves transferring the responsibility for enforcing road traffic regulations from the police to local government authorities. In the UK it also removes the penalty process from the jurisdiction of the criminal courts and transfers it to the civil arena. The result of the change from the criminal to the civil regime is an effective, computerised and automated process capable of processing high volumes of cases, but which fails when key elements, such as vehicle ownership data, are missing.
    Interesting (and morally questionable) thanks for sharing
  • ThePants999
    ThePants999 Posts: 1,748 Forumite
    First Anniversary Name Dropper First Post
    Options
    FWIW, the US are claiming that the congestion charge is really a tax, which they are exempt from paying.
  • HouseBuyer77
    Options
    US example but wikipedia has an example of officials from Zaire not paying rent and the landlord being unable to evict (with the US state department defending the officials): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diplomatic_immunity#Rents

    Given diplomatic immunity comes from international law the same scenario may well be possible here.

    So LLs better be beware of diplomats ;)
  • EachPenny
    EachPenny Posts: 12,239 Forumite
    First Post Combo Breaker
    Options
    aneary wrote: »
    Well the US diplomats owe loads in Congestion Charge and Parking Fines Boris says they should pay but the diplomats say they don't have to due to diplomatic immunity so it's a grey area.
    From the start the US position was the Congestion Charge was a tax which they are exempt under international law and treaties from paying. TfL have maintaned it is a 'charge', not a tax.
    G_M wrote: »
    Hmmmm but congestion charge is a criminal matter isn't it (magistrates court)? Maybe I'm wrong.
    It is a contravention not to pay the charge when liable to do so. The contravention is enforced under TfL's civil enforcement powers. Ultimately, TfL can apply to the Traffic Enforcement Centre (Northampton County Court) for a recovery order and then with a warrant of execution the case would be passed on to bailiffs to extract as many pounds of flesh as they are able (by that stage in the process the amount is eye-watering).
    aneary wrote: »
    It's been moved to civil.
    Congestion Charging has been civil enforcement from the start. In London the enforcement of parking had already been decriminalised and steps were already being taken to have moving traffic offences transfered as well. Outside of London the same process is happening, but ever so slowly.
    FWIW, the US are claiming that the congestion charge is really a tax, which they are exempt from paying.
    That's it in a nutshell. As above, it revolves around a dispute over whether it is a 'tax' or a 'charge'.

    The US position is not that they should have immunity from paying the penalty for non payment of the Congestion Charge, but that the charge itself is not applicable to them, because it is a tax.
    "In the future, everyone will be rich for 15 minutes"
  • 00ec25
    00ec25 Posts: 9,123 Forumite
    Combo Breaker First Post
    Options
    ahhh...the cult of "celebrity" - who is "Lily Allen"?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 343.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 250.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 449.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 235.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 608.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 173.2K Life & Family
  • 248.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards