We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Tories claims single pensioners are £110 worse off after Budget
StevieJ
Posts: 20,174 Forumite
Oh dear oh dear Cameron you are getting desperate :eek: I think most people want those freebies to well off pensioners stopped, and as for allowances being frozen and pensions only 2.4% they are based on the RPI at the end of September which was - (minus) 1.4.
If these had been applied strictly allowances should have been dropped by 1.4% and the pensioners received no increase at all. I bet even the most devoted no. 7's must be cringing at this one.
Pensioners will also pay more tax because of Mr Darling's decision to freeze income tax allowances.
According to Tory calculations, the freeze in the tax-free allowance of £9,490 for a single pensioner aged 65 to 74 meant that inflation of 3.7 per cent would reduce its value in real terms by £351.13. That means effectively higher income tax of £70.26 for a man on median earnings of £267 a week.
But the basic state pension will rise by just 2.5 per cent which the Conservatives said failed to match prices rises, costing another £59.
Mr Cameron said that Labour should be ashamed of how they have treated the elderly.
"They're going around scaring pensioners, telling you that the Conservatives are going to cut the winter fuel allowance, cut pension credit and end free bus travel and TV licences for over-75s.
http://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/tories-claims-single-pensioners-are-110-worse-off-after-budget-tele-9665ed4cbf41.html?x=0
If these had been applied strictly allowances should have been dropped by 1.4% and the pensioners received no increase at all. I bet even the most devoted no. 7's must be cringing at this one.
Pensioners will also pay more tax because of Mr Darling's decision to freeze income tax allowances.
According to Tory calculations, the freeze in the tax-free allowance of £9,490 for a single pensioner aged 65 to 74 meant that inflation of 3.7 per cent would reduce its value in real terms by £351.13. That means effectively higher income tax of £70.26 for a man on median earnings of £267 a week.
But the basic state pension will rise by just 2.5 per cent which the Conservatives said failed to match prices rises, costing another £59.
Mr Cameron said that Labour should be ashamed of how they have treated the elderly.
"They're going around scaring pensioners, telling you that the Conservatives are going to cut the winter fuel allowance, cut pension credit and end free bus travel and TV licences for over-75s.
http://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/tories-claims-single-pensioners-are-110-worse-off-after-budget-tele-9665ed4cbf41.html?x=0
'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher
0
Comments
-
Define "well off" for pensioners ?
I think this is smart electioneering from Cameron. Pensioners are the group most likely to vote and in many of the key marginals there are high proportions of pensioners. I also believe that pensioners who have contributed into the system deserve to get something out of it."There's no such thing as Macra. Macra do not exist."
"I could play all day in my Green Cathedral".
"The Centuries that divide me shall be undone."
"A dream? Really, Doctor. You'll be consulting the entrails of a sheep next. "0 -
they are so desperate.
so are the tories suggestion they would raise the tax free allowance for single pensioners? and what would they set it at? and how are they going to pay for it? (certainly not by cutting the national insurance contributions of earners as they have said they will do).Those who will not reason, are bigots, those who cannot, are fools, and those who dare not, are slaves. - Lord Byron0 -
I have over 10 years experience in advice. I have worked with young people, working age people, and pensioners.
The only group to have significantly benefitted from the benefits system in recent years is the over 60's. No exceptions. These "heat or eat" programmes are a complete nonsense. The rules are so generous, that it is quite unlikely that anyone over 60 will not qualify for at least 1 welfare benefit.
There are some people who don't, & the reason for that, is generally that they have an extremely large amount of savings. I saw a person not too long ago. He was 67. He was moaning about the fact that he has to pay his council tax, whereas his neighbour doesn't. Apparently it isn't fair.
Now, I would dare to suggest 2 things:
1) the neighbour didn't have £110k in 1 bank account, & £48k in a second bank account, in addition to 3 private pensions.
2) the person I was seeing doesn't need any help with a council tax bill of £1100 a year when they are sitting on a nest egg in excess of £150k.
The "entitled to" brigade covers all ages in society. A welfare system is supposed to help those in genuine need, not those who have the means to support themselves!
Really makes me :mad:It's getting harder & harder to keep the government in the manner to which they have become accustomed.0 -
lj interesting what you say about pensioners and financial comfort.
you certainly see fewer of the can of cat food, econo bread and pint of milk in the basket OAPs than you used to when the tories were in power.Those who will not reason, are bigots, those who cannot, are fools, and those who dare not, are slaves. - Lord Byron0 -
lemonjelly wrote: »I
There are some people who don't, & the reason for that, is generally that they have an extremely large amount of savings. I saw a person not too long ago. He was 67. He was moaning about the fact that he has to pay his council tax, whereas his neighbour doesn't. Apparently it isn't fair.
Now, I would dare to suggest 2 things:
1) the neighbour didn't have £110k in 1 bank account, & £48k in a second bank account, in addition to 3 private pensions.
2) the person I was seeing doesn't need any help with a council tax bill of £1100 a year when they are sitting on a nest egg in excess of £150k.
The "entitled to" brigade covers all ages in society. A welfare system is supposed to help those in genuine need, not those who have the means to support themselves!
Really makes me :mad:
So where is the incentive to save and provide for yourself if the state is going to dole money out to others. Labour is very happy to reward the !!!!less and punish the thrifty. I daresay he is annoyed he made provision for himself when others did not bother.
What really makes me :mad: is the whole benefit dependency culture that has grown up under labour. Where spongers are paid to sit on their a$$es and raise an army of children while we hard workers pay for it and then they, like that Chavvy Liverpudlian on the BBC reality show after the 10 o'clock news last night, moan that they do not have enough.
You should get out proportionate to what you have put in."There's no such thing as Macra. Macra do not exist."
"I could play all day in my Green Cathedral".
"The Centuries that divide me shall be undone."
"A dream? Really, Doctor. You'll be consulting the entrails of a sheep next. "0 -
Spartacus_Mills wrote: »Define "well off" for pensioners ?
We could start with the income where age allowance is reduced £22,900 I think.'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher0 -
lj interesting what you say about pensioners and financial comfort.
you certainly see fewer of the can of cat food, econo bread and pint of milk in the basket OAPs than you used to when the tories were in power.
I think there are a number of factors.
Pensioners generally are a little more savvy, & only spend when they need to.
Pensioners tend to avoid wasting anything where possible.
They already have lots of clothes, & don';t tend to dress up as much, therefore need less clothing.
They have concessionary travel.
They have more free time, therefore are (in theory) able to take advantage of off-peak reductions & the like.
Mortgage is likely to be paid in full.
Less financial commitments.
I actually believe that the reason you see a lot of pensioners buying v little, is that they shop almost every day, to avoid waste.
However over my life I have seen the lot of pensioners improved every budget. There are still those who complain, but they are the most likely to vote, so parties won't upset them. However, they are disproportionately looked after by the benefits system, & that burden will increase as baby boomers retire.
But any notion that pensioners have a struggle nowadays is a myth. Any pensioner who is struggling, will either:
have tons of cash in a bank they don't want to spend
or
have not claimed the welfare benefits they are entitled to.
& believe me, the first option is far & away the most likely. In 10-11 years, very few pensioners have seen me as they are experiencing real hardship. I could count the amount on my fingers I'd expect.
What gets me, is the constant trotting out of this myth...It's getting harder & harder to keep the government in the manner to which they have become accustomed.0 -
Spartacus_Mills wrote: »So where is the incentive to save and provide for yourself if the state is going to dole money out to others. Labour is very happy to reward the !!!!less and punish the thrifty. I daresay he is annoyed he made provision for himself when others did not bother.
What really makes me :mad: is the whole benefit dependency culture that has grown up under labour. Where spongers are paid to sit on their a$$es and raise an army of children while we hard workers pay for it and then they, like that Chavvy Liverpudlian on the BBC reality show after the 10 o'clock news last night, moan that they do not have enough.
You should get out proportionate to what you have put in.
For the purposes of clarity, you are saying that a person with over £150k should get state support to pay his council tax bill?
Thank god you're not in charge of the finances.
& FWIW I do feel that benefits should not be a lifestyle choice, & there should be a lot more "encouragement" (for want of a better word) on people to work.
One last thing, the guy with over £150k had recently recieved 3 years of phenomenally expensive NHS treatment (costing circa 3x his savings), so effectively he did recieve from the system. As had his children, educated at local schools. And so on...It's getting harder & harder to keep the government in the manner to which they have become accustomed.0 -
Spartacus_Mills wrote: »
I think this is smart electioneering from Cameron. Pensioners are the group most likely to vote and in many of the key marginals there are high proportions of pensioners. I also believe that pensioners who have contributed into the system deserve to get something out of it.
How can it be smart electioneering when it is so transparent (part of it almost lies), also it ties his hands if he wins the election at least for the foreseeable future.'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher0 -
lemonjelly wrote: »For the purposes of clarity, you are saying that a person with over £150k should get state support to pay his council tax bill?
This is what I said.
"So where is the incentive to save and provide for yourself if the state is going to dole money out to others. Labour is very happy to reward the !!!!less and punish the thrifty. I daresay he is annoyed he made provision for himself when others did not bother."
It is quite straightforward. I can understand his annoyance and where is the incentive to save if the government penalise the thrifty and reward the !!!!less. He is being punished for making provision for himself that is my point and that is a dangerous thing for a government that wants to encourage people to save for their old age. It is a wider point that some old codger who has to be advised by a clown.lemonjelly wrote: »Thank god you're not in charge of the finances.
Thank God I will never need to ask you for advice then. You know nothing of my ability to manage my finances. Some advisor you are. Jumping to obscure conclusions. Reading what they want to see in a comment and not what is actually there.lemonjelly wrote: »& FWIW I do feel that benefits should not be a lifestyle choice, & there should be a lot more "encouragement" (for want of a better word) on people to work.
One last thing, the guy with over £150k had recently recieved 3 years of phenomenally expensive NHS treatment (costing circa 3x his savings), so effectively he did recieve from the system. As had his children, educated at local schools. And so on...
Big deal, he has paid his taxes. Good for him."There's no such thing as Macra. Macra do not exist."
"I could play all day in my Green Cathedral".
"The Centuries that divide me shall be undone."
"A dream? Really, Doctor. You'll be consulting the entrails of a sheep next. "0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards