📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Are my Savings safe? Discussion Area

Options
1235

Comments

  • harryhound
    harryhound Posts: 2,662 Forumite
    During the fun and games of the run on Northern Wreck or is it Northern Crock; I found myself thinking similar thoughts about a nest egg in Alliance and Leicester. Here are some links:

    http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.html?t=554131&page=2

    http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.html?t=556632

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=481778&in_page_id=1770&ct=5

    I also 'phoned the A&L call centre and had an interesting chat with someone just going off duty on the Saturday morning:.................."Yes its been a busy night compared with normal; but we have had no real sense of panic".

    Since then I have been slowly diversifying my deposits to keep below the 35K "guarantee".

    It is all rather sad that the major problem is in USA BUT when USA banks start sneezing it is the smaller fry in the UK that catch the cold.

    For those of you who still have a mortgage, ask yourself "Has it been "securitised" ie sold-on to some investment organisation. If it has, don't expect any sympathy if you need to 'phone and explain that a little local personal difficulty will mean being late with the payment this month. Some obscure financial institution has no good name to loose by putting you on the street; all it will be interested in is the loan to value in a falling market.

    Harry.
  • jamesd
    jamesd Posts: 26,103 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    harryhound, lots of US subprime lenders have ceased trading or left the subprime market. Far more disruptive over there than here.
  • harryhound
    harryhound Posts: 2,662 Forumite
    So far.
    After more than a dozen years of rising property prices, I am sure that there must be some very "iffy" behaviour out there. Such as the kick back for off-plan "investors" in BTL flats, identified by the Portman BS. It has made a mockery of the Land Registry price figures.
    I am betting on a 15 - 20% property price fall before this is over.
  • hra_2
    hra_2 Posts: 92 Forumite
    It would be very useful to be able to know which subsidiary banks (if any) could legally be allowed to fail independently of their parents.

    For instance, if you have taken the view that HBOS is "too big to fail" then does that extend to Birmingham Midshires?

    Is Sainsburys bank, with its separate banking licence and split ownership, a different case?
  • busy_b
    busy_b Posts: 126 Forumite
    How safe are my savings when offsetting?

    Hope I'm in the right place - been advised to raise my query here as I've raised a few concerns in another forum.

    I offset all my savings against my mortgage with Barclays.
    36k savings offset 36k mortgage.
    With all the hype I wondered if my savings would still be treated as savings when being offset.

    I have received the following response from FSCS by e-mail today - Can anyone clarify?
    have spoken to our Legal Department, and this is their response:-
    Whether or not the mortgage and savings would be set off will depend upon whether the deposit taker is entitled to do so.
    This would apply to an offset mortgage as well.

    Accordingly, it would depend on the bank or building societies terms of business and the extent to which they were
    entitled to set off the mortgage against any deposits for the purpose of quantifying the 'overall net claim'. The position of
    building societies and banks is not the same under insolvency law, so that automatic set off may not apply on the
    insolvency of the building society, whereas it would be automatic on the insolvency of a bank.
  • busy_b wrote: »
    How safe are my savings when offsetting?


    Very good question. I would also be interested in the answer to this but can't work out that legal response.
  • scooby32
    scooby32 Posts: 154 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    Can anyone clarify this one. If I have a joint account with a very small balance and we both have seperate accounts ,how does the 70K not at risk worth. If I add all the accounts together they come to under 70K, however the accounts in one sole name come to more than £35k. I am wondering if I need to move some money or if the £70k in total rule applies if the other holder can pay in more. Hope this is clear,thanks in advance for any help
  • Mikeyorks
    Mikeyorks Posts: 10,377 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    scooby32 wrote: »
    ,how does the 70K not at risk

    It isn't £70k not at risk .... it's 'up to £70k'.

    So if your OH has £1 with that institution and you have £90k ..... she is protected for £1 and you for £35k. Permutations follow the same theme.
    If you want to test the depth of the water .........don't use both feet !
  • jamesd
    jamesd Posts: 26,103 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    busy b, I can clarify that offset answer a bit.

    Banks have a right in law to offset your debts on one account against your credits in other accounts. So a bankrupt bank could apply all of your credit balances against your debit balances. Hence it appears that the FSCS answer is that your mortgage balance with a bank will first be reduced by any credit balances in your own or joint accounts before working out whether you've lost any money.

    In this case you haven't lost money, it's just been applied to the mortgage and you could remortgage with another lender to get back the split between offset credit balance and mortgage debt balance.

    If your total deposits exceed the mortgage, deduct the mortgage value from the total deposit value to work out how much is at risk.

    This appears to favor saving with a bank with which you have a mortgage, when the bank has a right of offset, since the mortgage debt seems to protect your savings balances.

    Similarly it seems to favor depositing with the building society with your mortgage if and only if it has a right of offset against the savings to repay the mortgage - the right to take your savings to repay the mortgage. This is not automatic as it is with banks so it seems necessary to verify in each case.

    This also appears to clarify the situation with flexible mortgages with right to draw down overpaid amounts, you'd lose the right to take the money out and would need to remortgage to do so. But you wouldn't lose the money, you'd just have your mortgage reduced until you remortgaged.
  • I've recently sold some unit trusts in my Hargeaves Lansdown "Vantage" account and asked them to hold on to the cash for the moment. I checked how safe this cash was and they told me that the first £48000 is guaranteed under the FSA rules that apply to them.

    It seems crazy that conservatively invested money (in a deposit/ savings account) is guaranteed upto £35000 but the government looks after your money more safely when it is about to be invested in the intrinsically more risky stock market.

    Where's the logic in that?

    Rob777
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.