Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

A lot of talk...

1246789

Comments

  • Snooze
    Snooze Posts: 2,041 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Must admit i have been accused of being a drug user a couple of times now on mse. i am going to have to change my angle. I've noticed a few of the hardcore bears have been missing lately...SORTOFOK, DOLCEVITA ETC

    Well I had to ask because a good number of your past posts had been spot on and made perfect sense, but then all of a sudden you come out with this rubbish about it all being over and everything's hunkydory again.

    One can only assume you are seriously unwell or on some kind of medication. :huh:

    Rob
  • m00m00
    m00m00 Posts: 1,755 Forumite
    Snooze wrote: »
    Well I had to ask because a good number of your past posts had been spot on and made perfect sense, but then all of a sudden you come out with this rubbish about it all being over and everything's hunkydory again.

    One can only assume you are seriously unwell or on some kind of medication. :huh:

    Rob


    or bored, and out to get a rise out of people who take the internet a bit too seriously ?
    It's a health benefit ...
  • southernscouser
    southernscouser Posts: 33,745 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    That's what I love about this board.

    Someone gives their opinion and if you don't agree with it you act like a ****. :confused:

    Says a hell of alot more about you than the OP. In my opinon. (see what I did there? :))
  • IveSeenTheLight
    IveSeenTheLight Posts: 13,322 Forumite
    Pobby wrote: »
    Iveseenthelight is still dancing on top of the "New Paradigm peak", singing happy songs for all his worth...

    Nice graphs. I think anyone in their right mind would agree with the second graph. I for have the thinking of the right hand boxes. £ years ago I was stressed out with the amount of business I was handling. Now I am stressed by the lack of it!!!!

    No just being realistic, if you are going to highlight my name, try to show something which you can factually prove I said was incorrect.
    I wont hold my breath

    As for the graphs, mean nothing without scaling.
    Also from HPC, this graph shows we are only 22% on average overvalued.
    Either a 22% drop is required now or less than 15% over 3 years
    homepage.png

    Actually the trend of using a 2.4% inflation for the Average Real House Price Trend is actually incorrect.
    If you refer to this it shows that between 1975 and 2006 there was a total inflation rise of 597%. This equates to approx 5.93% per year rise. the link shows a rise of 618% since 1975.

    Arguably, if you were to project this trend of 5.93% per year a 50,000 property would be values at 316,000. Probably not far from current prices.

    Are properties over valued?, possibly but more realistically, we are probably returning to an era where not everyone can afford to buy property.
    :wall:
    What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
    Some men you just can't reach.
    :wall:
  • Generali
    Generali Posts: 36,411 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    No just being realistic, if you are going to highlight my name, try to show something which you can factually prove I said was incorrect.
    I wont hold my breath

    As for the graphs, mean nothing without scaling.
    Also from HPC, this graph shows we are only 22% on average overvalued.
    Either a 22% drop is required now or less than 15% over 3 years
    homepage.png

    Actually the trend of using a 2.4% inflation for the Average Real House Price Trend is actually incorrect.
    If you refer to this it shows that between 1975 and 2006 there was a total inflation rise of 597%. This equates to approx 5.93% per year rise. the link shows a rise of 618% since 1975.

    Arguably, if you were to project this trend of 5.93% per year a 50,000 property would be values at 316,000. Probably not far from current prices.

    Are properties over valued?, possibly but more realistically, we are probably returning to an era where not everyone can afford to buy property.

    The biggest problem with putting a straight line for inflation on the graph is that inflation has been far from constant over the period. Check the NSO website but I think you'll find they bounced around between 10-20% in the late 70s & early 80s, fell pretty dramatically through the 80s before another steep rise at the end of the Lawson Boom in the late 80s and then declined through to about 4-5 years ago since when they have been relatively static (in historic terms).

    Graphs like that are generally huge over simplifications (IMO) and also imply a 'reversion to mean' as if houses had some kind of collective memory as to the correct price level they should have.

    From a pretty facile look at the house market, the long term driver seems to be rising levels of home ownership and the short term driver the growth in money supply/inflation.

    My guess is that as the population ages, older people will sell big houses and buy smaller ones as they slowly work out they've been sold into a vast pyramid scheme with the state pension - the money isn't there to pay them and it can't be paid for with taxes without destroying the economy. People are going to have to sell the only asset they have in many cases - their house.
  • thriftybabe
    thriftybabe Posts: 689 Forumite
    beingjdc wrote: »
    Popping up to say something has spooked the futures market again. It currently expects the average UK house to cost £146k in December 2010 (was £200k at the peak) and the average London house to cost £232k (was £305k at the peak).


    I hope that is not true! My OH and I are contemplating moving abroad as we do not see Construction ever being the way it was again. That would definitely not be good for us as that would at the time we would probably hoping to sell!:mad:
  • 3under3
    3under3 Posts: 174 Forumite
    Arguably, if you were to project this trend of 5.93% per year a 50,000 property would be values at 316,000. Probably not far from current prices.

    I think a house worth 50k in 1975 would be on the market for a great deal more than 316k these days...

    My parents bought a semi for around 30k in 1979 which were selling last year around the 300k mark.
  • Generali
    Generali Posts: 36,411 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    3under3 wrote: »
    I think a house worth 50k in 1975 would be on the market for a great deal more than 316k these days...

    My parents' place was bought in 1976 for £20k and would be marketed for about £450-500k today at a guess.

    It is about 10 miles from a station which has excellent links to London so is commutable if you don't mind a very long journey to work. More people seem to be prepared to do that these days and the price has probably risen faster than the market as a whole to reflect that. I guess that the price will fall faster than average as prices fall as more people are able to afford a better commute.
  • Paul_N_4
    Paul_N_4 Posts: 344 Forumite
    No just being realistic, if you are going to highlight my name, try to show something which you can factually prove I said was incorrect.
    I wont hold my breath

    As for the graphs, mean nothing without scaling.
    Also from HPC, this graph shows we are only 22% on average overvalued.
    Either a 22% drop is required now or less than 15% over 3 years
    homepage.png

    Actually the trend of using a 2.4% inflation for the Average Real House Price Trend is actually incorrect.
    If you refer to this it shows that between 1975 and 2006 there was a total inflation rise of 597%. This equates to approx 5.93% per year rise. the link shows a rise of 618% since 1975.

    Arguably, if you were to project this trend of 5.93% per year a 50,000 property would be values at 316,000. Probably not far from current prices.

    Are properties over valued?, possibly but more realistically, we are probably returning to an era where not everyone can afford to buy property.

    Who said that line represents inflation? Its simply a trend line. The average increase in property prices over a time period. So you've gone off on a bit of a tangent with your figures there.
  • skap7309
    skap7309 Posts: 874 Forumite
    Post number 14.......................

    HOLY CRAP! Didnt think things were quite THAT bad! :eek:
    Only a matter of time before prices plummet after seeing that :beer: :j
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.2K Life & Family
  • 258K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.