We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Trading Standards vs incarexpress.co.uk
Options
Comments
-
You implied that your statutory rights were being infringed.
Your statutory rights (that apply in this instance) as stated by the SOGA are "36. Buyer not bound to return rejected goods Unless otherwise agreed,"
When you agreed to purchase the stereo, you agreed to the terms and conditions of the site which are "the warranty does not cover the cost of return for testing "
Because you had "otherwise agreed" (by buying from a site with this clause), you are released from the "buyer not bound to return rejected goods".
The company are sticking by your statutory rights to not have to "return rejected goods unless otherwise agreed."
It's unfair, and a PITA for you, but they are within their rights.0 -
well if my rights say i have the right to do or not do something and they write something that affects that, that is not allowed, hence the requirement of "your statuatory rights are unaffected"click here to achieve nothing!0
-
OP you can argue on here all you like and to I.C.E , at the end of the day I.C.E have the upper hand as they have your cash, for the sake of £6 send it back and once they have tested it and found it faulty (which they are intitled to do) they will refund your money, if they dont give your postage back then you can take it further.0
-
OP you can argue on here all you like and to I.C.E , at the end of the day I.C.E have the upper hand as they have your cash, for the sake of £6 send it back and once they have tested it and found it faulty (which they are intitled to do) they will refund your money, if they dont give your postage back then you can take it further.
Well i originally asked for advice about who was right and who was wrong, the extra entries to keep people informed.
A good point you raised about a company taking my money for duff goods and having the "upper hand" does that seem right to you?
So is all publicity good publicity?, upper hand? we will see on the 30thclick here to achieve nothing!0 -
Wether its right or wrong its true isnt it0
-
Wether its right or wrong its true isnt it
damm we are getting mystical here actually i don't think taking £86.00 and having me pursue you for it is really an "upper hand" for taht i would want a lot more money lol
so as always truth is just a perspectiveclick here to achieve nothing!0 -
damm we are getting mystical here actually i don't think taking £86.00 and having me pursue you for it is really an "upper hand" for taht i would want a lot more money lol
so as always truth is just a perspective
But the truth is:
a) You agreed to the terms and conditions.
b) You changed your mind and refused to agree to them when the item was faulty.
c) The company have both the upper hand and the stronger legal hand.
d) Their costs are going to far outweigh your refund and postage.
You asked for advice on who is right or wrong. They are right, you are wrong. What you should do is:
Get the returns number from the site.
Return the item, keeping proof of postage.
Wait for the company to find that your item was indeed faulty.
Wait for your refund.
If your refund includes postage - call it quits.
If it doesn't, write to them by recorded letter asking for your refund of all delivery costs.
If they refuse THEN go to court.0 -
But the truth is:
a) You agreed to the terms and conditions.
b) You changed your mind and refused to agree to them when the item was faulty.
c) The company have both the upper hand and the stronger legal hand.
d) Their costs are going to far outweigh your refund and postage.
You asked for advice on who is right or wrong. They are right, you are wrong. What you should do is:
Get the returns number from the site.
Return the item, keeping proof of postage.
Wait for the company to find that your item was indeed faulty.
Wait for your refund.
If your refund includes postage - call it quits.
If it doesn't, write to them by recorded letter asking for your refund of all delivery costs.
If they refuse THEN go to court.
TBH i didnt even read the terms and conditions so i cant have agreed to anything but i did check to see if they had the statutory notice, thats all
Its all far too late for this dude and no offence but when you confused some companies terms for the soga i really think i can't trust you handing out advice on this let alone telling me who is right or wrongclick here to achieve nothing!0 -
-
Brooker_Dave wrote: »I don't think it works like that.click here to achieve nothing!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards