We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Flooded
annie1990
Posts: 2 Newbie
My neighbors flooded my property due to a burst pipe was wondering who would be liable I have had my adjuster from my insurance company and tomorrow his adjuster is coming out to morrow but he owns the property but he lets it out any help would be much appreciated
0
Comments
-
My neighbors flooded my property due to a burst pipe was wondering who would be liable I have had my adjuster from my insurance company and tomorrow his adjuster is coming out to morrow but he owns the property but he lets it out any help would be much appreciated
You haven't said but what is it you need help with ?0 -
If anybody had went through this and who would pay for the damages him,his insurance, my insurance? Thanks0
-
Unless he was negligent, your insurance.0
-
His contents insurance should cover your loss; at least thats how it worked when a fire in my house also damaged the neighbors; their loss was paid from my contents insurance.0
-
If the neighbour has been negligent in anyway, then he is liable.
However, if the burst pipe 'just happened' then the neighbour can't be held negligent and, therefore, isn't liable for any damage to your property.
Either claim from your insurance, and let them claim from your neighbours insurance. Or pay it yourself, and claim directly from your neighbour if you think they have been negligent.0 -
If it was a burst pipe caused by the unusually cold weather, there's probably no negligence, so either you or your insurer will have to pay for any damage.
But if the neighbour is fibbing, and it was really something like an unattended bath that overflowed, then the tenant or their insurer is liable for the damage (because the tenant would have been negligent to let a bath overflow).0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards