We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Facebook fake ads tool

Although probably not its intended purpose the new Facebook scam tool could be useful for those dodgy "Top ISA" sites and other financial ads.
https://damn-lies-and-statistics.blogspot.com/2019/01/top-isa-rates-misleading-fake.html

Just be sure to include your reasons why when using it as I doubt the Facebook staff know the rules on promoting unregulated investments.

Comments

  • Malthusian
    Malthusian Posts: 11,055 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I doubt it will make much difference to the "Top ISA Rates" end of the market. Facebook already takes down the blatant scams through the report button it's always had. And the non-blatant scams will be waved through by the specialist team.

    I think Martin Lewis copped out by accepting this settlement. £3 million for this task force. By contrast, Surge spent in the region of £6 million on London Capital and Finance Facebook ads. (£26 million spent on advertising in total, £20 million spent on Google, and most of the rest is likely to have gone to Facebook as there weren't many other significant channels.)

    These would probably have been waved through by Facebook even after being reviewed by the specialist team. At time of writing, Surge has not broken any laws with its misleading list of unregulated bonds and regulated investments and deposit accounts, or by advertising it on Facebook. (Their CEO was arrested and then released without charge.)

    If this specialist team had existed at the time and had reported back to Facebook's advertising department to say "It looks a bit dodgy and the investments it offers are high risk, but they're not breaking any laws and LCF is a regulated company" then are the ad managers going to drop the ads or keep them up and keep the £6 million? Not to mention the legal risk of accusing an active company with deep pockets of being a scam?

    Martin Lewis would have done more good for the public if he'd not settled and forced Facebook to explain in court why they allow these ads to appear.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.