Your browser isn't supported
It looks like you're using an old web browser. To get the most out of the site and to ensure guides display correctly, we suggest upgrading your browser now. Download the latest:

Welcome to the MSE Forums

We're home to a fantastic community of MoneySavers but anyone can post. Please exercise caution & report spam, illegal, offensive or libellous posts/messages: click "report" or email forumteam@. Skimlinks & other affiliated links are turned on

Search
  • FIRST POST
    • Savannah02K
    • By Savannah02K 7th Feb 18, 8:50 AM
    • 295Posts
    • 451Thanks
    Savannah02K
    Pressure to buy carpet from unknown supplier
    • #1
    • 7th Feb 18, 8:50 AM
    Pressure to buy carpet from unknown supplier 7th Feb 18 at 8:50 AM
    Had a water leak from tank couple of weeks ago, ruined the landing and stair carpet. The insurance company 'devolve' carpet 'issues' to an outside company who seem to be carpet wholesalers and fitters. They've now offered me the option of replacement carpets from them or a ridiculously small cash settlement. I don't know this company or its products, I like to deal with local tradespeople and have always bought carpets from them. Has anyone had any experience of this and how likely am I to get an increased offer if I protest to the insurance company? I genuinely can't see how the carpet company can do a new for old, including the fitting, at the price they've quoted so it makes me very suspicious about the quality of their products.
Page 1
    • FlameCloud
    • By FlameCloud 7th Feb 18, 8:59 AM
    • 1,819 Posts
    • 883 Thanks
    FlameCloud
    • #2
    • 7th Feb 18, 8:59 AM
    • #2
    • 7th Feb 18, 8:59 AM
    The cash price they quote to you will not be the same as the price they would pay for the actual reinstatement work if it went ahead - it will be discounted. Various reasons for this but mainly due to a lower mark up and a cash settlement is technically not on a reinstatement (what you have called new-for-old) basis, it is on an indemnity basis.

    Assuming they can provide a like for like match, then their limit of liability is the cost they can replace it for through their supplier network.
    • Blibble
    • By Blibble 7th Feb 18, 9:11 PM
    • 433 Posts
    • 751 Thanks
    Blibble
    • #3
    • 7th Feb 18, 9:11 PM
    • #3
    • 7th Feb 18, 9:11 PM
    Whilst you may prefer to use an independent supplier, your policy will cover you for a supplier of your insurer's choosing.

    In this case, their supplier can put you back in a like-for-like position, or you can take the cash payment as a gesture of goodwill (for want of a better term) to use an independent.

    The preferred settlement of your claim (for your insurer) is through their supplier, and that's what's been offered on a new-for-old basis.
    Wedding fund - 2890.92 (1262.07)
    OP fund - 1427.23 (138.67)
    Emergency fund - 159.00
Welcome to our new Forum!

Our aim is to save you money quickly and easily. We hope you like it!

Forum Team Contact us

Live Stats

348Posts Today

4,187Users online

Martin's Twitter
  • It's the start of mini MSE's half term. In order to be the best daddy possible, Im stopping work and going off line? https://t.co/kwjvtd75YU

  • RT @shellsince1982: @MartinSLewis thanx to your email I have just saved myself £222 by taking a SIM only deal for £7.50 a month and keeping?

  • Today's Friday twitter poll: An important question, building on yesterday's important discussions: Which is the best bit of the pizza...

  • Follow Martin