IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including QR codes, number plates and reference numbers.

Gladstones --- THE PURGE

Options
We are seeing more Gladstones activity of late
threatening people with court

Now, we are all aware that Gladstones are incompetent
but this could be to do with the new government rules
about taking people to court which comes in on 1st Oct

This purge could well be getting claims in before that date

At this stage, anyone receiving these threatening letters
from Gladstones should respond if the letter ref starts with #1

All of these should be responded to by the keeper, not driver,
stating that any debt is denied and requesting proof of
their claim
Keep a copy of the letter or email

As Gladstones are known to ignore anything they do not
understand, it is possible such requests will be ignored

However, if they continue to court the judge must be informed
that you attempted to mitigate, this was ignored and to date
no answer was provided.

As the courts well know about Gladstones, such ignorance
would go in your favour.
«134

Comments

  • For those that want/need it, the "chapter and verse" of the provisions to read up on.

    For a start, we'll have proper disclosure and a proper period (30 days) to respond to any letter of claim. There is lots to be interested in, here:
    https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/pdf/protocols/pre-action-protocol-for-debt-claims.pdf
  • Castle
    Castle Posts: 4,200 Forumite
    First Anniversary Name Dropper First Post
    Options
    Johnersh wrote: »
    For those that want/need it, the "chapter and verse" of the provisions to read up on.

    For a start, we'll have proper disclosure and a proper period (30 days) to respond to any letter of claim. There is lots to be interested in, here:
    https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/pdf/protocols/pre-action-protocol-for-debt-claims.pdf

    But is a claim for damages, a debt in the first place?
  • pappa_golf
    pappa_golf Posts: 8,895 Forumite
    Combo Breaker First Post
    Options
    this does absolutely NOTHING regarding "credit clamping"

    guv.jpg

    in fact it clearly states that no responce within 30 days , they can start court action , NO mention of having to use "trace" to find the correct address , which can be as much as 5 yrs and 10 mths out of date ,
    Save a Rachael

    buy a share in crapita
  • There has never been a requirement in any proceedings of any value to prove the correct service address is used. That responsibility is on the claimant.

    But that's why the CPR contains set aside provisions (and why proceedings should not be acknowledged if there is a defect of service).
  • pappa_golf
    pappa_golf Posts: 8,895 Forumite
    Combo Breaker First Post
    Options
    yup , why should this government be worried, wrong outdated address £255 in the kitty , thank you
    Save a Rachael

    buy a share in crapita
  • beamerguy
    beamerguy Posts: 17,587 Forumite
    First Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper First Post
    Options
    pappa_golf wrote: »
    yup , why should this government be worried, wrong outdated address £255 in the kitty , thank you

    At least with the new provisions, these legals that parking
    companies use will have to think very carefully and go
    through the hoops. They are bound to make mistakes
  • Guys_Dad
    Guys_Dad Posts: 11,025 Forumite
    First Post Combo Breaker
    Options
    beamerguy wrote: »
    At least with the new provisions, these legals that parking
    companies use will have to think very carefully and go
    through the hoops. They are bound to make mistakes

    What a scurrilous post. Disgraceful, in my opinion.

    Are you really suggesting that Gladstones, a reputable firm of solicitors with impeccable credentials and track record are liable to make mistakes with the changes?

    You, sir, are a bounder.


    ;)
  • beamerguy
    beamerguy Posts: 17,587 Forumite
    First Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper First Post
    Options
    Guys_Dad wrote: »
    What a scurrilous post. Disgraceful, in my opinion.

    Are you really suggesting that Gladstones, a reputable firm of solicitors with impeccable credentials and track record are liable to make mistakes with the changes?

    You, sir, are a bounder.


    ;)

    haha, you jest old boy. You surely are not John Davies
    or come to that Will Hurley. ? .... are you ?

    Such brash comments from you could be treason

    I know, you work for the SRA:)
  • Half_way
    Half_way Posts: 7,054 Forumite
    First Anniversary Name Dropper First Post
    Options
    Did someone mention milky bars?
    From the Plain Language Commission:

    "The BPA has surely become one of the most socially dangerous organisations in the UK"
  • beamerguy
    beamerguy Posts: 17,587 Forumite
    First Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper First Post
    Options
    Because all threads on this site show on google
    when people search, if you are being contacted
    by Gladstones start your new thread with the title ...

    Gladstones .......

    This will help others find this site for all the help
    they need to fight back against these financial terrorists
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 343.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 250.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 449.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 235.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 608.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 173.1K Life & Family
  • 247.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards