IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including QR codes, number plates and reference numbers.
Gladstones --- THE PURGE
Options
beamerguy
Posts: 17,587 Forumite
We are seeing more Gladstones activity of late
threatening people with court
Now, we are all aware that Gladstones are incompetent
but this could be to do with the new government rules
about taking people to court which comes in on 1st Oct
This purge could well be getting claims in before that date
At this stage, anyone receiving these threatening letters
from Gladstones should respond if the letter ref starts with #1
All of these should be responded to by the keeper, not driver,
stating that any debt is denied and requesting proof of
their claim
Keep a copy of the letter or email
As Gladstones are known to ignore anything they do not
understand, it is possible such requests will be ignored
However, if they continue to court the judge must be informed
that you attempted to mitigate, this was ignored and to date
no answer was provided.
As the courts well know about Gladstones, such ignorance
would go in your favour.
threatening people with court
Now, we are all aware that Gladstones are incompetent
but this could be to do with the new government rules
about taking people to court which comes in on 1st Oct
This purge could well be getting claims in before that date
At this stage, anyone receiving these threatening letters
from Gladstones should respond if the letter ref starts with #1
All of these should be responded to by the keeper, not driver,
stating that any debt is denied and requesting proof of
their claim
Keep a copy of the letter or email
As Gladstones are known to ignore anything they do not
understand, it is possible such requests will be ignored
However, if they continue to court the judge must be informed
that you attempted to mitigate, this was ignored and to date
no answer was provided.
As the courts well know about Gladstones, such ignorance
would go in your favour.
0
Comments
-
For those that want/need it, the "chapter and verse" of the provisions to read up on.
For a start, we'll have proper disclosure and a proper period (30 days) to respond to any letter of claim. There is lots to be interested in, here:
https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/pdf/protocols/pre-action-protocol-for-debt-claims.pdf0 -
For those that want/need it, the "chapter and verse" of the provisions to read up on.
For a start, we'll have proper disclosure and a proper period (30 days) to respond to any letter of claim. There is lots to be interested in, here:
https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/pdf/protocols/pre-action-protocol-for-debt-claims.pdf
But is a claim for damages, a debt in the first place?0 -
this does absolutely NOTHING regarding "credit clamping"
in fact it clearly states that no responce within 30 days , they can start court action , NO mention of having to use "trace" to find the correct address , which can be as much as 5 yrs and 10 mths out of date ,Save a Rachael
buy a share in crapita0 -
There has never been a requirement in any proceedings of any value to prove the correct service address is used. That responsibility is on the claimant.
But that's why the CPR contains set aside provisions (and why proceedings should not be acknowledged if there is a defect of service).0 -
yup , why should this government be worried, wrong outdated address £255 in the kitty , thank youSave a Rachael
buy a share in crapita0 -
pappa_golf wrote: »yup , why should this government be worried, wrong outdated address £255 in the kitty , thank you
At least with the new provisions, these legals that parking
companies use will have to think very carefully and go
through the hoops. They are bound to make mistakes0 -
At least with the new provisions, these legals that parking
companies use will have to think very carefully and go
through the hoops. They are bound to make mistakes
What a scurrilous post. Disgraceful, in my opinion.
Are you really suggesting that Gladstones, a reputable firm of solicitors with impeccable credentials and track record are liable to make mistakes with the changes?
You, sir, are a bounder.
0 -
What a scurrilous post. Disgraceful, in my opinion.
Are you really suggesting that Gladstones, a reputable firm of solicitors with impeccable credentials and track record are liable to make mistakes with the changes?
You, sir, are a bounder.
haha, you jest old boy. You surely are not John Davies
or come to that Will Hurley. ? .... are you ?
Such brash comments from you could be treason
I know, you work for the SRA:)0 -
Did someone mention milky bars?From the Plain Language Commission:
"The BPA has surely become one of the most socially dangerous organisations in the UK"0 -
Because all threads on this site show on google
when people search, if you are being contacted
by Gladstones start your new thread with the title ...
Gladstones .......
This will help others find this site for all the help
they need to fight back against these financial terrorists0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 343.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 250.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 449.7K Spending & Discounts
- 235.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 608.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 173.1K Life & Family
- 247.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards