We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Issue With Home Care

Options
bensim90
bensim90 Posts: 17 Forumite
Fourth Anniversary 10 Posts Combo Breaker
Morning All,

I am disappointed with a certain companies home care boiler cover! On a property I rent out i signed up to home care in the interest of achieving a gas safety certificate for my boiler. I was given a few options but did not want all the plumbing and drain cover so considered the basic two options! One was a straight forward gas safety check for a small fee and the other included the former but also a boiler service. I took the latter at around double the cost if i remember.

When the engineer visited he simply took gas readings of the boiler and issued the certificate. He explained that if the readings are fine no service is done. He said I should of taking just the gas safety option and upgraded if work was required. In my opinion meaning basically I somewhat over paid for the additional "service", Maybe its just my interoperation of service but I literally would have achieved the same result taking the cover at half the price! It is in there terms which I should of read :(

Would anyone consider this miss selling or at the very least miss leading? I should of complained to them at the time.

Boiler has now developed a fault which I realise could happen at any time but I believe it would not if checked properly. My argument is if a boiler service as I believe a service to be (and I'm sure you all will to) had ensued as I was led to believe it would (albeit i dindt read the small print) this would have been picked up. They now want me to upgrade to cover it or pay a one off boiler repair.

Any thoughts would be great thank you.

Comments

  • As you say, you didn't read the contract. You probably only paid to get readings done, and a certificate issued. If you'd paid more, you would have received a full service.

    You are probably correct that if it received a service it would not have developed the fault, but you didn't pay for that.

    At least you'll be able to offset the cost of a replacement against your tax bill!
  • bensim90
    bensim90 Posts: 17 Forumite
    Fourth Anniversary 10 Posts Combo Breaker
    Thing is I did pay for the "Service" 100%

    The cheaper option would of simply been the readings and the cert. My package included the service but ONLY if the readings were concerning and thats their "service" option, if the readings are fine they go no further!

    Hence why i feel ive been misled as the end result would of been the same with the cheeper option, even the engineer said so and that I should of upgraded if the readings were off.

    Totally misleading
  • macman
    macman Posts: 53,129 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Next time use a local independent GSR RGI who will do the job you pay them for.
    No free lunch, and no free laptop ;)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.8K Life & Family
  • 257K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.