The State Retirement Pension and extra NICs

Options
2

Comments

  • zolablue25
    zolablue25 Posts: 1,652 Forumite
    Options
    drumtochty wrote: »
    Guys in approx April 2016 to the summer of 2016 you were given both the amount of the old and the new system pension on your pension statement and then advised you would get what was the higher of the two amounts.

    Then later in the summer 2016 the pensions minister advised he had got complaints that advising two different values then advising that the higher of the two values would be awarded to the person was considered far to complicated. They then advised the DWP to simplify the statement by only showing the value the person would get.

    If they were going to put only one value down (to avoid confusion) then it might have been better for them to say "Your pension forecast is for £X, and you were assessed under the old/new rules".
  • SnowMan
    SnowMan Posts: 3,358 Forumite
    Name Dropper First Anniversary First Post Photogenic
    edited 22 April 2018 at 10:06AM
    Options
    I did not know this. Are you sure it is correct?

    Are you saying that, if someone did not have enough years left before reaching SP age to make sufficient NI contributions to get the full nSP, they can pay pre-2016/17 years as voluntary NICs, even though they already have 30 qualifying years and their starting amount was based on the old SP?
    I am saying that in some cases where the old rules calculation applies at April 2016, and is based on 30 (to 34 years) at April 2016, and you don't have enough post April 2016 years to get up to the full new state pension, buying missing pre April 2016 years can be viable, but not in the generality.

    The relevant scenario is where the new rules calculation is close, but less than the old rules calculation in the starting amount calculation but adding one or more years into the calculation switches the result around to the new rules calculation biting.

    Adding an extra year doesn't increase the old rules calculation in the starting amount calculation when 30 years has already been reached at April 2016 of course. But it does increase the new rules calculation in the starting amount calculation when there are less than 35 qualifying years, as that is based on up to 35 years counting.

    In my example the starting amount might have been calculated as

    Old rules: 30/30 x 119.30 + 0.70 (additional pension) = 120
    New rules: 30/35 x 155.65 - 14.41 (COPE) = 119

    Buying a missing pre April 2016 year changes this to

    Old rules: 30/30 x 119.30 + 0.70 = 120 (same years count)
    New rules: 31/35 x 155.65 - 14.41 = 123.45 (extra year counts)

    So the starting amount increases from £120pw to £123.45pw based on buying a single missing pre April 2016 year.

    If there are 5 post April 2016 years to add then the eventual state pension increases from about £142.25pw (120 + 4.45 x 5) to £145.70pw (120 + 4.45 x5). Where 4.45 = 155.65/35.

    So in this case there is value in buying a missing pre April 2016 year even though the starting amount is initially based on the old rules calculation and 30 years up to April 2016.

    All figures in 2016/2017 terms.

    If in this example there were say 3 missing in time pre April 2016 years, then it's potentially a big opportunity missed in not purchasing those years. Easy to miss, try the Royal London flowchart and see if this scenario is picked up or not.
    I came, I saw, I melted
  • YoungFIGuy
    Options
    SnowMan's calculations appear correct to me. And, having looked at the Royal London flowchart, it doesn't show this scenario - but it does talk about this in the wording (on page 12):

    "Just to add to the complexity, whether your starting amount is based on the old rules or the new rules could ‘flip’ following the payment of voluntary contributions. For example, if you pay a pre-2016 year which makes no difference to your old rules pension (because you already have 30 qualifying years) it could make a difference to your new rules pension (because you can have 35 qualifying years). In some cases this means your starting amount would now be based on the new rules. The ‘Check your State Pension’ website will ultimately guide people through these complexities."

    This scenario highlights the problem with having a 'discontinuity' in calculations. It can result in counter-intuitive results, such as in this scenario.
  • RedMonty
    RedMonty Posts: 123 Forumite
    First Anniversary Name Dropper First Post Combo Breaker
    Options
    Oh dear. As a disabled person looking after my kids I've been in and out of work over the years & have many gaps in my record. At regular intervals over at least the last 15 years I've been in touch with HMRC to find out just what the gaps were and how I could fill them in. HMRC have always taken my details and promised to get back to me, and not once have they done so. I've done many follow-up calls, all to no avail.

    Recently the NI contributions website was launched, and yes it shows gaps in my record, some quite small e.g. 42 weeks were paid in some years, only needing a topup of 10 weeks to count as a full year.

    Oddly, one year (2013-14) shows I made 82 weeks of NI contributions in that year.

    However I can't top up anything more than 6 years ago.

    Do i have a case for complaining that I've been denied the chance to top up gaps for the years I've been in contact with HMRC on this issue? (i.e. from 15 to 6 years ago)?
  • Daniel54
    Daniel54 Posts: 833 Forumite
    First Anniversary Name Dropper First Post
    Options
  • bostonerimus
    bostonerimus Posts: 5,617 Forumite
    First Anniversary Name Dropper First Post
    Options
    There are two big issues I see with the new system.

    1) Not being able to use a spouse's contributions is surely going to leave some people worse off in the transition. Getting credits for being at home/caring is good, but how are those administered?

    2) People with Class 2 contributions get a big pension increase from the BSP level up to the NSP.
    “So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.”
  • RedMonty
    RedMonty Posts: 123 Forumite
    First Anniversary Name Dropper First Post Combo Breaker
    edited 8 May 2018 at 6:00PM
    Options
    xylophone wrote: »
    Yes, I've got that info thanks. Thanks too for the linky to Steve Webb's guide, I've read it now. Most of it doesn't apply to me, but it's useful background info.
    Daniel54 wrote: »

    Thanks, yes that covers gaps of a couple of years, but there are gaps from a few years before
    - early 2000s that when I was contacting HMRC and not getting any reply. I think I'll have to accept that's all gone now. As it stands, I'll have to make NI contributions for every 20-odd years from now till retirement age to get full pension, and given my spotty work history, that's a risky strategy for me.

    It's a bit upsetting as the website shows I have roughly 10 years in total of contributing 35-40-odd weeks of NI per year, none of which counts a jot towards my pension.

    Edit - to clarify, if HMRC had got back to me when I first asked, I would have been able to fill in nearly all these years.
  • bostonerimus
    bostonerimus Posts: 5,617 Forumite
    First Anniversary Name Dropper First Post
    Options
    RedMonty wrote: »

    It's a bit upsetting as the website shows I have roughly 10 years in total of contributing 35-40-odd weeks of NI per year, none of which counts a jot towards my pension.

    30 years ago I was at university and worked part time summer jobs and HMRC would send me a letter every year and ask if I wanted to top up my contributions to get a full year., did they stop doing that?
    “So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.”
  • greenglide
    greenglide Posts: 3,301 Forumite
    First Anniversary Combo Breaker Hung up my suit!
    Options
    did they stop doing that?
    Yes, they did.

    The "deficiency notices" were always a bit hit and miss and when the old NIRS system was replaced with NIRS2 in the 90s the resulting chaos saw the end of these. I have a feeling that there was a fight between Accenture (Andersen Consulting at the time) over whether they were ever contracted to do this.

    Of course if we had ever got a regular statement of NI contributions this would not be an issue!
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 343.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 250.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 449.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 235.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 608.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 173.1K Life & Family
  • 247.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards