📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Government scraps planned probate fees hike - MSE News

The Government has reversed its decision to change probate fees, which would have seen some bereaved families pay almost £6,000 extra...
Read the full story:
'Government scraps planned probate fees hike'
OfficialStamp.gif
Click reply below to discuss. If you haven’t already, join the forum to reply.

Comments

  • Doc_N
    Doc_N Posts: 8,554 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Yet another blatant piece of electioneering by this appalling government, with an even more appalling PM.

    The ONLY reason this is now going is the number of votes it will cost these incompetents!
  • pip895
    pip895 Posts: 1,178 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Good decision in my opinion - its a fee not a tax.
  • MumOf2
    MumOf2 Posts: 612 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts
    Exactly Pip, thank you. It's so easy to brush the increases aside with 'well they can pay it because it only adversely affects higher value estates'. But it's the executors (and ultimately the beneficiaries) who pay the additional fee, and in our case this is no small amount and we don't personally have the funds available as we submit our application.

    Well done, whoever made the decision to scrap the increase.

    Obiter, I just wonder how much net profit they actually make from all this. It must cost them a fortune to administer, check and investigate inheritance tax accounts, and how much net do they actually get out of the whole rigmarole? The only people who benefit are the lawyers, accountants, probate specialists and banks who are engaged by family members who are grieving and just don't have the emotional, intellectual or physical reserves to complete the myriad forms required.

    MumOf2
    x
    MumOf4
    Quit Date: 20th November 2009, 7pm

  • pip895 wrote: »
    Good decision in my opinion - its a fee not a tax.

    The policy failed the dog test. ie if it has got 4 legs, a wet nose and barks it is a dog. The government may describe it as a cat (or fee) but it is a dog (or tax).

    Some not very bright civil servant or politician in the ministry of justice was just trying to balance their budget, but came up with this wheeze which was probably illegal anyway if introduced by statutory instrument alone.
  • Capitano
    Capitano Posts: 14 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10 Posts Combo Breaker
    Very nice to see that this proposed additional tax on death (It takes the same amount of work for probate irrespective of estate value) has been scrapped. When is the government now going to give us all a decent IHT free allowance, rather than penalising those of us without
    direct descendents?
  • Uxb1
    Uxb1 Posts: 732 Forumite
    500 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    No it certainty does not take the same amount of effort regardless of estate value.
    Large estates with complicated circumstances and all sorts of illiquid and difficult to value items are going to need a LOT more work by HMRC to make sure the family/executors are being accurate and fair on the valuations to ensure the correct IHT is paid.

    Of course under the now scrapped proposals smaller estate were going to pay less for probate - but hey I doubt anyone gives a toss about them.

    Expect it to re-introduced if the conservative win the election.
  • Doc_N
    Doc_N Posts: 8,554 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Uxb1 wrote: »

    Expect it to re-introduced if the conservative win the election.

    Likewise a continuation of the damaging cuts which are destroying the NHS, the roads, libraries, museums, education and the country's entirely infrastructure.
  • pip895
    pip895 Posts: 1,178 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Uxb1 wrote: »
    No it certainty does not take the same amount of effort regardless of estate value.
    Large estates with complicated circumstances and all sorts of illiquid and difficult to value items are going to need a LOT more work by HMRC to make sure the family/executors are being accurate and fair on the valuations to ensure the correct IHT is paid.

    Of course under the now scrapped proposals smaller estate were going to pay less for probate - but hey I doubt anyone gives a toss about them.

    You are muddling up government departments the fee is for probate not HMRC who incidentally do rather well out of large estates already;).

    The work involved in registering a death and posting up the will is not estate size dependant.
  • badger09
    badger09 Posts: 11,623 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    pip895 wrote: »
    You are muddling up government departments the fee is for probate not HMRC who incidentally do rather well out of large estates already;).

    The work involved in registering a death and posting up the will is not estate size dependant.

    With respect, so are you. It is government who 'does rather well out of large estates already', rather than HMRC.

    Just sayin;)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.2K Life & Family
  • 258K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.