📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Regulators 'need to do more' to prove they protect consumers - MSE News

The spending watchdog has said that the regulators for financial services, energy, water and communications sectors are unable to prove they are offering enough protection for consumers...
Read the full story:
'Regulators 'need to do more' to prove they protect consumers'
OfficialStamp.gif
Click reply below to discuss. If you haven’t already, join the forum to reply.

Comments

  • Consumerist
    Consumerist Posts: 6,311 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    They seem mainly moribund to the point of being ineffective but the consumer is still paying their wages through their bills.

    By the time the regulators have round to actually doing something, the service providers have got their next dirty trick lined up for action. And the regulators seem incapable of expecting what consumers are expecting to happen in response to what little they do.

    The 'too little , too late' brigade, if you ask me.
    >:)Warning: In the kingdom of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.
  • boatman
    boatman Posts: 4,700 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    The whole process of going through the ombudsman takes so long I'm sure many people just give up. The companies know this and many seem happy to fleece people knowing the vast majority won't take it to the ombudsman. The regulator perhaps needs to put an immediate charge of £100 for example against a company until the situation is resolved, it may encourage them in their thinking..
  • MothballsWallet
    MothballsWallet Posts: 15,882 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    boatman wrote: »
    The whole process of going through the ombudsman takes so long I'm sure many people just give up. The companies know this and many seem happy to fleece people knowing the vast majority won't take it to the ombudsman. The regulator perhaps needs to put an immediate charge of £100 for example against a company until the situation is resolved, it may encourage them in their thinking..
    I'd go further and make the immediate charge 10% of the company's CEO's salary - it'd certainly wake the CEO up if they start to lose money - and make it a non-refundable charge.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.2K Life & Family
  • 258K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.