We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Revealed: Shoppers given WRONG sale return rights info by 10 online stores
Options

MSE_Sarah
Posts: 329 MSE Staff



Ten online retailers including household names such as Accessorize and Oasis have been giving shoppers the wrong info about their return rights for sale items, a MoneySavingExpert.com investigation reveals - and five more including M&S and New Look have given info we believe is misleading...
Read the full story:
'Revealed: Shoppers given WRONG sale return rights info by 10 online stores'

Click reply below to discuss. If you haven’t already, join the forum to reply.
'Revealed: Shoppers given WRONG sale return rights info by 10 online stores'

Click reply below to discuss. If you haven’t already, join the forum to reply.
Follow MSE on other Social Media: MSE Facebook, MSE Twitter, MSE Deals Twitter, Instagram, Threads, Join the MSE ForumGet the Free MoneySavingExpert Money Tips E-mailReport inappropriate posts: click the report buttonFlag a news story: news@moneysavingexpert.com
0
Comments
-
You've gave incorrect information yourself.4. You aren't entitled to the cost of sending the goods back. So beware if ordering from elsewhere in the European Union as returning them can be expensive.
5. If goods are faulty you are then entitled to reasonable costs of return back. In this case the Consumer Rights Act comes into play.
4 should read that you aren't entitled to the cost of sending the goods back if the retailer makes you aware you will be liable for this cost before you enter the contract (and if the goods cannot be returned by normal post - perhaps because its a bulky item of furniture - then the retailer must also tell you the cost of returning the goods). If they do not, then the retailer is liable for those costs.
5. If goods are faulty, then your only obligation is to make the goods available for collection (at your convenience and the retailers expense) unless you have previously agreed to return rejected goods. In that case, you are entitled to reasonable costs of return.You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride0 -
House of Fraser insist that, having bought online and collected in store, you then return in store, you only get a gift card. Whereas if you return by post, you get a cash refund. Is this distinction valid?0
-
deepdale56 wrote: »House of Fraser insist that, having bought online and collected in store, you then return in store, you only get a gift card. Whereas if you return by post, you get a cash refund. Is this distinction valid?
Do you pay online before collecting in store or pay when you collect in store?
Thats the only distinction I can think of that would affect it - because paying online makes it a distance contract (on which you have statutory rights to cancel for a refund) and the store is just the delivery address. While paying in store on collection means its an on-premises contract, which do not benefit from any statutory cancellation period.You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards