We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Unknown PPI, Serious Illness and a Retrospective Claim

Backstory: in 2010 I had an Egg Card and have recently found out that I was paying for PPI unbeknown to me. Not much later I ended up entering into an IVA agreement after the breakdown of my marriage which was then completed early due to receiving some inheritance.

So life is now good and we are now in the present. I find out I'm owed a PPI refund (which will probably end up with Payplan because of the aforementioned IVA), but I have realised that whilst having the Egg Card I had been diagnosed with testicular cancer from which I could have made a claim (the whole point of PPI).
I did at the time claim through a PPI policy I had with my mortgage which paid out.

I am now of the belief I could have also claimed on the PPI policy on the Egg Card.

The questions therefore are:
Am I correct in thinking a claim on the Egg Card PPI policy should have been raised?
Is there any way of retrospectively claiming? Especially as I was unaware I even had the policy?

Look for to hearing your comments.
Neil

Ps. I obviously survived the cancer and am currently living my happily ever after :)

Comments

  • Nasqueron
    Nasqueron Posts: 11,212 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    You should have raised it yes
    You can try but if you have complained about it they will be unlikely to entertain a claim as well

    Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness: 

    People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.

  • Bermonia
    Bermonia Posts: 977 Forumite
    500 Posts
    It would be down to the insurer to entertain a retrospective claim - keep in mind if they agree you will need to satisfy all their evidentiary requirements, also this would need to have been diagnosed prior to your financial difficulties as any missed payments would likely have invalidated/canceled your policy.

    Also your mid-sale complaint would need to be put on hold, obviously if your mid-sale complaint were to succeed it would put you back in a position had you never taken the policy - you would therefore be unable to claim against it.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.2K Life & Family
  • 260.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.