PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING
Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.Quick question re. BTL
Options
thenap80
Posts: 421 Forumite
I have a house that I rent out. It is worth approx 300k and I own outright (not mortgaged)
I want to buy another place - seen a place for 250k.
My question is do I take out a brand new BTL mortgage on the new property, or as someone advised me, mortgage the 300k house I already own and let, and take 150k from that (plus 100k deposit I now have) for buying the new place.
I don't see how it would make any difference? In both instance I'm estimating the LTR ratio would be less than 60 percent.
What is normal practice in this scenario?
Thanks
I want to buy another place - seen a place for 250k.
My question is do I take out a brand new BTL mortgage on the new property, or as someone advised me, mortgage the 300k house I already own and let, and take 150k from that (plus 100k deposit I now have) for buying the new place.
I don't see how it would make any difference? In both instance I'm estimating the LTR ratio would be less than 60 percent.
What is normal practice in this scenario?
Thanks
0
Comments
-
I have a house that I rent out. It is worth approx 300k and I own outright (not mortgaged)
I want to buy another place - seen a place for 250k.
My question is do I take out a brand new BTL mortgage on the new property, or as someone advised me, mortgage the 300k house I already own and let, and take 150k from that (plus 100k deposit I now have) for buying the new place.
I don't see how it would make any difference? In both instance I'm estimating the LTR ratio would be less than 60 percent.
What is normal practice in this scenario?
Thanks
Deja vu
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.php?t=58031650 -
Didn't get an answer last time matey!0 -
-
The advantage of remortgage the existing is that you have cash in bank to buy the second. That can open up some properties that would be difficult to purchase with a mortgage (renovation, auction, non-standard construction, etc).
The disadvantage is you have money sat in bank costing interest whilst you look for your second purchase.
If your second purchase will be a normal mortgageable property then it makes no difference (as alread stated in the other thread).0 -
Didn't get an answer last time matey!What I do struggle to get my head round though is why is it best to do it this way - tat is to say, why not just take out a new mortgage on the second property I would buy?kingstreet wrote: »You're right.
It makes no difference, whatsoever.0 -
The_Earl_of_Streatham wrote: »That sort of attitude is unlikely to get you one this time either.
Attitude? Excweez me? Bacon powder? It was a simple reply my friend!0 -
You need to talk to your accountant or see one if you don't have one already0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 343.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 250.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 449.7K Spending & Discounts
- 235.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 608.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 173.1K Life & Family
- 247.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards