PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

New laws to protect tenants against unfair charges - MSE News

Options
Landlords will have to provide evidence of the cost of repairs and replacements to their tenants before they can impose charges - under new plans revealed by the Government today...
Read the full story:
'New laws to protect tenants against unfair charges'
OfficialStamp.gif
Click reply below to discuss. If you haven’t already, join the forum to reply.
«1

Comments

  • NJB62
    NJB62 Posts: 19 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10 Posts Combo Breaker
    In the legal sense, I am also a Tenant, despite owning my property.
    Does this Act (once it has received Royal Assent) apply to Leaseholders such as myself, who are managed by Landlords and their Managing Agents?
  • Comms69
    Comms69 Posts: 14,229 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    Its absolute rubbish.


    Instead of just providing a basic understanding of the law to tenants the govt continues to put pressure on landlords.
  • I agree it is rubbish but not for that reason and it may stop frivolous claims from LLs because they might have to put a bit more effort in God forbid.

    Anyway What kind of evidence, a quote?

    What good will this do when fair wear and tear needs to be considered, probably just delay sorting it out via the deposit scheme while the LL gets the evidence together.

    Might work for lightbulbs but not much else.
  • Grezz24
    Grezz24 Posts: 234 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary
    its a shame this wont come into effect for existing tenancy agreements, I fully expect a fight with my landlord/letting agent for them to keep my deposit, as have every single past landlord ive had (regardless of how spotless the house is upon return / throughout tenancy).

    I know there are a lot of good landlords out there its just a shame ive not encountered one.
  • Smodlet
    Smodlet Posts: 6,976 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Comms69 wrote: »
    Its absolute rubbish.


    Instead of just providing a basic understanding of the law to tenants the govt continues to put pressure on landlords.

    Not nearly enough, imo. It is well beyond high time England's idiotically rich-skewed laws were brought in line with Scotland's and all LLs were required not only to register but to achieve accreditation before they are allowed to be LLs.

    I agree providing "quotes" is a joke; any fool with photoshop or similar can come up with "quotes" until the cows come home.
  • Comms69
    Comms69 Posts: 14,229 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    Smodlet wrote: »
    Not nearly enough, imo. It is well beyond high time England's idiotically rich-skewed laws were brought in line with Scotland's and all LLs were required not only to register but to achieve accreditation before they are allowed to be LLs.

    I agree providing "quotes" is a joke; any fool with photoshop or similar can come up with "quotes" until the cows come home.
    The problem ofcourse is the more people you put off being a landlord - the harder it is to find rental property.


    You end up with those who don't give a ____ and big corporations who are only interested in profit and have no human element. (e.g. some landlords are more understanding of for example changing jobs and wages having to catch up)
  • Smodlet
    Smodlet Posts: 6,976 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Comms69 wrote: »
    The problem ofcourse is the more people you put off being a landlord - the harder it is to find rental property.


    You end up with those who don't give a ____ and big corporations who are only interested in profit and have no human element. (e.g. some landlords are more understanding of for example changing jobs and wages having to catch up)

    Hence the need for regulation...
  • benjus
    benjus Posts: 5,433 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    What's the point of this law?

    In the £100 light bulb example the existing laws around deposit protection worked perfectly to resolve the situation. Why do we need another law?
    Let's settle this like gentlemen: armed with heavy sticks
    On a rotating plate, with spikes like Flash Gordon
    And you're Peter Duncan; I gave you fair warning
  • Nasqueron
    Nasqueron Posts: 10,688 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Comms69 wrote: »
    The problem ofcourse is the more people you put off being a landlord - the harder it is to find rental property.


    You end up with those who don't give a ____ and big corporations who are only interested in profit and have no human element. (e.g. some landlords are more understanding of for example changing jobs and wages having to catch up)

    Perhaps fewer landlords buying homes to rent more could be sold to buyers who would otherwise have to rent? Not saying it would but always possible

    Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness: 

    People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.

  • If deposits are to be limited to 6 weeks, perhaps the government can make it possible to evict troublesome tenants within 6 weeks.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.