Multi-Asset Funds - Differences?
Options
Comments
-
Both very good points which is why this is so damned difficult
in a way, not knowing does help because if you are looking at underlying passive funds, then there are only three things to consider.
1 - asset allocation (home bias, property inclusion etc)
2 - and style (rigid allocations or fluid - will aim to stay in a volatility range or float up and down the scale a bit).
3 - charges
Cautious investors should look to those that are risk targetted. If you are higher up the scale then its not really an issue and returns are the focus.
L&GMI, Architas, HSBC, Std Life for example at the lower to medium end as they are all risk targetted.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
Thank you
Would you say I'm missing anyone or any category of fund off my list if "LifeStrategy Like" was my intention?0 -
Thank you
Would you say I'm missing anyone or any category of fund off my list if "LifeStrategy Like" was my intention?
I think the main names are all mentioned on this thread.
We changed our position on VLS almost two years ago from a buy to a hold. New money goes elsewhere. But that is just our position.
The US stimulus has been given at the wrong point of the cycle. Throwing oil on a raging fire doesn't give a significant benefit vs the amount you pour on. Whereas pouring that on a weak fire can bring it to life. Stimulus is best given at a different point and there may not be the money to use when it is needed. Or it may not be enough (if you have poured on so much stimulus that you have nothing left to give then it will just die and you won't have anything to help rebuild and boost it).
So, I suspect the next decade will be like the pre-credit crunch decade for the US. Again, its a guess but you rarely see the same sectors perform best two times in a row.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
Thanks and interesting take on VLS mostly because on here it seems to be almost worshipped
Looking into the MyFolio range now.0 -
I think the main names are all mentioned on this thread.
We changed our position on VLS almost two years ago from a buy to a hold. New money goes elsewhere. But that is just our position.
The US stimulus has been given at the wrong point of the cycle. Throwing oil on a raging fire doesn't give a significant benefit vs the amount you pour on. Whereas pouring that on a weak fire can bring it to life. Stimulus is best given at a different point and there may not be the money to use when it is needed. Or it may not be enough (if you have poured on so much stimulus that you have nothing left to give then it will just die and you won't have anything to help rebuild and boost it).
So, I suspect the next decade will be like the pre-credit crunch decade for the US. Again, its a guess but you rarely see the same sectors perform best two times in a row.0 -
aroominyork wrote: »So do you think that when people say global markets are increasingly integrated and moving in similar directions, that is just because stimulus has been sending all Western markets up at the same time while emerging markets are, um, emerging, and that the apparent integration is just a blip?
In a globalised economy, all will follow. It will just be degrees of difference.
Over the last 5 years, the sector average:
66.61 Global sector
69.91 Japan
47.72 UK
94.06 North America]
The split is much the same over 10 years except the US pulling away more.
In every cycle, the one pulling away and the laggard is usually different to the one before. Often swapping places.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
I think someone needs to launch a multi-multi-asset fund that invests in the available multi-asset funds according to their weighting in discussion in threads like this.0
-
The bottom line is that if you go with any of these, you will get broadly similar performance with all of them when matching risk profile (or as close as you can get). One will do better in one period as it has more in an area that is doing better. The next period it will be someone elses turn and so on.0
-
That seems to me a good reason for have at least a couple of multi asset funds for a large portfolio (if not using single sector funds) rather than putting it all in one multi asset fund, as some other people on the forum have previously recommended.
If you are not going single sector then upto £85k (the new FSCS limit coming) in each would be fine. Variations of a theme. Under FSCS limits, no knowing which will be best...... why notI am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 343.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 250.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 449.7K Spending & Discounts
- 235.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 608.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 173.1K Life & Family
- 247.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards