house builder wants me to remove my driveway

13

Comments

  • getmore4less
    getmore4less Posts: 46,882 Forumite
    Name Dropper First Anniversary First Post I've helped Parliament
    edited 9 August 2018 at 11:51AM
    They changed the house on plot 222 shown in some of the drawings.

    That was a 2015 planning application 15/00415
  • What a shame that four properties so far have ripped up what were quite attractive front lawns and paths and replaced them with an unsightly mass of gravel. It looks terrible. As well as perhaps being unpopular with neighbours if you delay the adoption of the road, I suspect some aren't happy that the reality of their street looks nothing like the relatively green frontages in the brochures and showhomes.

    In reality, it's inevitable that most will go the same route and what was once quite an attractive street will look like a badly organised car dealership in a builder's yard.

    Nobody is selling cars down here or selling bricks/sand/cement.....................

    What a strange view you have on things
  • EachPenny
    EachPenny Posts: 12,239 Forumite
    First Post Combo Breaker
    here is the parking provisions for the site(2013).
    According to that a restrictive standard of no more than 1.5 spaces per dwelling on average was applied as part of a condition on the outline application. This includes designated on-street bays.

    Unless there was a change of policy it would be difficult to believe that PD rights to create additional parking spaces were not removed. Otherwise what was the point in setting that restrictive standard?
    "In the future, everyone will be rich for 15 minutes"
  • EachPenny
    EachPenny Posts: 12,239 Forumite
    First Post Combo Breaker
    Nobody is selling cars down here or selling bricks/sand/cement.....................

    What a strange view you have on things
    If you were a planning officer you wouldn't find it strange at all. Most of them regard cars as a visual intrusion on the streetscape and many would favour an outright ban on front-garden parking in residential areas.


    Hard landscaped gardens are also the planning officers equivalent of stone cladding. ;)
    "In the future, everyone will be rich for 15 minutes"
  • lincroft1710
    lincroft1710 Posts: 17,640 Forumite
    Photogenic Name Dropper First Anniversary First Post
    Nobody is selling cars down here or selling bricks/sand/cement.....................

    AD never said they were, In AD's view that is what the street looks or will look like if everyone converts their front garden into additional car parking
    If you are querying your Council Tax band would you please state whether you are in England, Scotland or Wales
  • NaughtiusMaximus
    NaughtiusMaximus Posts: 2,832 Forumite
    First Anniversary Name Dropper First Post
    edited 9 August 2018 at 12:45PM
    EachPenny wrote: »
    If you were a planning officer you wouldn't find it strange at all. Most of them regard cars as a visual intrusion on the streetscape and many would favour an outright ban on front-garden parking in residential areas.

    As opposed to the aesthetically pleasing view of the road being crammed with parked cars along every available bit of kerb?
  • Aylesbury_Duck
    Aylesbury_Duck Posts: 13,986 Forumite
    First Anniversary First Post Name Dropper
    As opposed to the aesthetically pleasing view of the road being crammed with parked cars along every available bit of kerb?
    Yes. That's much tidier than cars crammed in at all angles on DIY "driveways".
  • Yes. That's much tidier than cars crammed in at all angles on DIY "driveways".

    Each to their own, but I think aesthetically they're as bad as each other. At least when the cars are on the drive it's less of a PITA for anyone driving along the street.
  • stator
    stator Posts: 7,441 Forumite
    Name Dropper First Anniversary Combo Breaker First Post
    EachPenny wrote: »
    According to that a restrictive standard of no more than 1.5 spaces per dwelling on average was applied as part of a condition on the outline application. This includes designated on-street bays.

    Unless there was a change of policy it would be difficult to believe that PD rights to create additional parking spaces were not removed. Otherwise what was the point in setting that restrictive standard?

    Just because the builder had to comply with certain planning matters to get their designs approved doesn't necessarily mean the permitted development has been removed from a property.



    OP needs to query the building company about what their legal justification is going to be if they wish to take action against him.
    Changing the world, one sarcastic comment at a time.
  • Typhoon2000
    Typhoon2000 Posts: 1,122 Forumite
    First Anniversary First Post Combo Breaker
    From what the OP has said there is appears to be no legal justification to take action against him. The Builder messed up by not ensuring there was a covenant to ensure front gardens could not be changed ( at least until they finished building and washed their hands of the development).

    If the changes he has mage to his front garden comply with permitted development, there is no action the council can take against him either.

    To move forward the the OP has to make changes to allow the the road to be adopted. I would look to ask the builder to help with the cost invlolved.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 343.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 250.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 449.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 235.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 608K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 173.1K Life & Family
  • 247.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards