IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including QR codes, number plates and reference numbers.
VCS and Iceland, semi resolved.
Comments
-
IamEmanresu wrote: »Wouldn't have made much difference as you were wrong in the first place. The "mitigation" issue was kicked into touch by Beavis. The VCS case is prior to the Supreme Court's enlightenment.
In any case the toothbrush threat was all about contempt of court/abuse of process and not about "mitigation"
About what? Not standing for a nonsensical leaving site scam, where a muppet hides and watches it?0 -
About what?
About the difference between a contractual charge and "mitigation of loss". You should know the difference by now and why that case is irrelevant.
The only warning is the warning on the signs which is the responsibility of the driver to look for and the responsibility of the parking company not to hide.
It's all explained in Beavis.0 -
the "mitigation of loss" I referred to was meant to be the duty of the PPC's agent to mitigate the loss by informing the customer not to leave the site
appols for causing confusion .... :mad:
Ralph:cool:0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 343.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 250.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 449.7K Spending & Discounts
- 235.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 608K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 173K Life & Family
- 247.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards