We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

VCS and Iceland, semi resolved.

2»

Comments

  • fisherjim
    fisherjim Posts: 7,111 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Wouldn't have made much difference as you were wrong in the first place. The "mitigation" issue was kicked into touch by Beavis. The VCS case is prior to the Supreme Court's enlightenment.

    In any case the toothbrush threat was all about contempt of court/abuse of process and not about "mitigation"




    About what? Not standing for a nonsensical leaving site scam, where a muppet hides and watches it?
  • System
    System Posts: 178,403 Community Admin
    10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    About what?

    About the difference between a contractual charge and "mitigation of loss". You should know the difference by now and why that case is irrelevant.

    The only warning is the warning on the signs which is the responsibility of the driver to look for and the responsibility of the parking company not to hide.

    It's all explained in Beavis.
    This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com
  • Ralph-y
    Ralph-y Posts: 4,802 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    the "mitigation of loss" I referred to was meant to be the duty of the PPC's agent to mitigate the loss by informing the customer not to leave the site



    appols for causing confusion .... :mad:


    Ralph:cool:
  • fisherjim
    fisherjim Posts: 7,111 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Ralph-y wrote: »
    the "mitigation of loss" I referred to was meant to be the duty of the PPC's agent to mitigate the loss by informing the customer not to leave the site



    appols for causing confusion .... :mad:


    Ralph:cool:


    My point Exactly!
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 602.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178K Life & Family
  • 260.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.