We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Want to become a Forum Ambassador? Visit the Community Noticeboard for details on how to apply
Claim for malicious damages to Financial Ombudsman after denied by Lloyd's insurance
Comments
-
The storage company involded is Access Self Storage but the terms & conditions of this last is similar to standard Access Self Storage Ts & Cs. However, as themeselves they breached the contract and their terms & conditions, I beleieve this last is no more relevant (especially if I can prove their harassment, misleading etc...Worth noting that the standard Access Self Storage Ts & Cs specifically exclude liability for consequential business losses (and cap liability at the value of the stored items):
so even if you can demonstrate breach of contract, the relevant damages would be limited....0 -
I believe implicitly FOS can proceed with this case breach of contract considering the consequences of this last as described here.
Perhaps you've got an overactive autocorrect or aren't a native English speaker but it's not clear to me what you actually mean by your repeated references to 'this last', this last what?The storage company involded is Access Self Storage but the terms & conditions of this last is similar to standard Access Self Storage Ts & Cs. However, as themeselves they breached the contract and their terms & conditions, I beleieve this last is no more relevant (especially if I can prove their harassment, misleading etc...
Anyway, it still sounds like you need to sort out exactly who you plan to pursue and how - assault and harassment by individuals are criminal matters that need to involve the police, but breach of contract is a civil matter that would need to be pursued by suing the company, so my point was that the latter would be judged by reference to the contractual Ts & Cs rather than any criminal actions of employees.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.2K Spending & Discounts
- 246.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
