We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
PPI claims 1990 where to start
pepperpop
Posts: 37 Forumite
Hi there
I think I had PPI on an Egg card (not details though and also a Virgin One mortgage and Barclays Loan. I remember roughly when I had them and my address at the time - do I have a chance in claiming? I have read about sending an SAR - what is this and is there a template letter that I can use (I have read these are free from 25/5/18?). These claims would be for late 90's.
Thanks for any advice offered
I think I had PPI on an Egg card (not details though and also a Virgin One mortgage and Barclays Loan. I remember roughly when I had them and my address at the time - do I have a chance in claiming? I have read about sending an SAR - what is this and is there a template letter that I can use (I have read these are free from 25/5/18?). These claims would be for late 90's.
Thanks for any advice offered
0
Comments
-
You complain to whoever sold you the account. Egg are split between Canada Square and Barclaycard depending on the dates. You need to see if either of them have any records of you left.
Barclays go to Barclays
Virgin One go to Virgin
A SAR is a request for all the details they hold on you, it's not needed for a complaint unless they can't find any details on the first level of support and you want to trawl their history
Do note though if the accounts are from the 90s unless the account was closed recently chances are they won't have any records left so the complaint won't go anywhereSam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness:
People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards