PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING

Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.

Service Charges - Will i see the benefit?

Options
13»

Comments

  • takman
    takman Posts: 3,876 Forumite
    Combo Breaker First Post
    Options
    micky007 wrote: »
    to answer some of your questions:

    1) Its a detached house
    2) Its a lease-hold property (but i also pay ground rent which is £125 every 6 months)
    3) I was told when buying the house there would be a service charge but wasnt told what it was for at first
    4) There is no communal facilities
    5) @InterestedParty2018 there is 2 roads they built (different streets) which the other houses are built on, but i dont see why the houses that are built on the main road should be billed for that when we never use that road to access our property etc... since we are on the main road owned by the council. There was 7 houses built on the main road and around 33 houses built on the 2 roads they made off the main road.
    6) You can view the sitemap of the build here, ive hidden the street name of the main road and also the development name. - https://screenshots.firefox.com/IjilgRaGa84AA3xI/www.redrow.co.uk

    As you can see there is no need for the houses built on the main road to even access the 2 streets they made since we all have driveways and our properties are accessed via the main road.

    At least your not paying a massive amount; your service charge and ground rent only work out to £35a month.

    It's a shame you don't have one of those old leases where you only pay a peppercorn rent then you might have not felt so bad about having to pay a service charge for a lane you don't even need to use.
  • AlexMac
    AlexMac Posts: 2,990 Forumite
    First Anniversary Name Dropper First Post Combo Breaker
    edited 12 April 2018 at 3:11PM
    Options
    All we can do is sympathise and hope you can live with it and put it down to experience.

    Better luck next time; lets hope they continue to underspend so that all you're stuck with is the two and a half grand management, admin and accounting fee and the sinking fund contribution. I see from the budget that they anticipated spending twice that, so presumably your service charge will be adjusted down for the underspend on the actuals? That's what my Local Authority Freeholder does. But then, they ain't profit-driven capitalists, lol

    As regards...
    micky007 wrote: »
    ... 3) I was told when buying the house there would be a service charge but wasnt told what it was for at first
    ... that too is unfortunate, but at best, just means you've learned lessons about house-buying. Including not to trust solicitors to ask the right questions. Although to be fair, they often only ask for the past three years' Service Charge accounts, which didn't exist as you were buying a new build. I hope you didn't use the solicitor recommended by the Sales office; but if you did, that too would be a lesson learned.

    I've walked away from leasehold purchases in the past if Service Charges have not been completely transparent; including asking my own questions (direct or via the Solicitor).

    Hope you can live with it? You're right to think that it's not fair, but I fear that a Complaint to your Solicitor (because they failed to brief you properly) would not succeed in terms of a result of financial redress .

    You could look at
    https://www.lease-advice.org/advice-guide/service-charges-other-issues/
    and consider if you could get all the other leaseholders on board in a Tribunal challenge of the charges' "reasonableness"... But I don't know what your chances would be, since, as the web guidance says at paragraph 2.8 -

    - "leaseholders have a right to ask the Tribunal whether a charge, or a proposed charge, is reasonable; however, there is no statutory definition of what is reasonable;. "
  • InterestedParty2018
    Options
    Sorry OP, didnt revisit your post so didnt see the subsequent posts. Also, I am too late to open the attachments now.
    Based on the subsequent exchanges, it appears that that you knew that service charge would be levied and you proceeded with the purchase anyway. Therefore your question is about value for money rather than "is it or isnt it" due.

    Obviously I cannot comment on your individual TP1/Lease, however broadly with Estate management with limited "communal services" there still needs to a be a central point to manage things.

    The trees that are referred to may not need much maintenance now, but who is going to take responsibility for them when they need lopping/crowning etc?

    The footpath you mention which was in situ prior to the development, is it on Estate owned land? If so, there will need to be someone maintaining it, possibly insuring with PI Insurance?

    What about breaches? Some Estates have strict covenants regarding external house colours & materials - who will deal with these if there is no central managing agent?

    I guess the management may seem non-existent, until you need the services.
  • bobwilson
    bobwilson Posts: 595 Forumite
    Options
    takman wrote: »
    At least your not paying a massive amount; your service charge and ground rent only work out to £35a month.

    It's a shame you don't have one of those old leases where you only pay a peppercorn rent then you might have not felt so bad about having to pay a service charge for a lane you don't even need to use.


    "At least you're not paying", not "At least your not paying". You know, takman, for someone who corrects other people's spelling & grammar, and berates others' lives, it's ironic you can't spell yourself and are guilty of these things.
  • takman
    takman Posts: 3,876 Forumite
    Combo Breaker First Post
    Options
    bobwilson wrote: »
    "At least you're not paying", not "At least your not paying". You know, takman, for someone who corrects other people's spelling & grammar, and berates others' lives, it's ironic you can't spell yourself and are guilty of these things.

    It's seems I've touched a nerve with my comments on your thread :rotfl:.

    You should go back and read the last post I made on there again. Due to autocorrect on my phone a whole word has been incorrectly replaced in a sentence!. Your going to have a field day when you spot it, have fun!.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 343.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 250.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 449.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 235.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 608K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 173.1K Life & Family
  • 247.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards