We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Landlord wants to stop the lift
Comments
-
Shame there isn't a wheelchair user living in the block. The ll would have no choice but to keep the lift running until such time as the wheelchair user decided to move.Never Knowingly Understood.
Member #1 of £1,000 challenge - £13.74/ £1000 (that's 1.374%)
3-6 month EF £0/£3600 (that's 0 days worth)0 -
The first place to ring would be the local fire station, ask them about fire regulations.
The Equality Act 2010 - so no disabled person would be able to visit/live in the flats, because someone wants to save some money. Definitely against that law.0 -
sevenhills wrote: »The first place to ring would be the local fire station, ask them about fire regulations.
The Equality Act 2010 - so no disabled person would be able to visit/live in the flats, because someone wants to save some money. Definitely against that law.
There's no requirement for flats to have a lift so disabled people can visit! There's not even an obligation on a LL to install a lift so a disabled can live there, though it's more likely that they would be obliged to continue operating it if a disabled resident was already there. The key to disability adjustments is reasonableness, and a LL would not be expected to incur a disproportionate level of cost to accomodate a prospective tenant or visitor.
I don't know about any H&S Regs, but in terms of the EqAct it is definitely not against the law to not have an operating lift.0 -
The key to disability adjustments is reasonableness, and a LL would not be expected to incur a disproportionate level of cost to accomodate a prospective tenant or visitor.
It would not be a reasonable cost to retrospectively fit a lift, it is reasonable to maintain a lift that is already there.0 -
-
sevenhills wrote: »It would not be a reasonable cost to retrospectively fit a lift, it is reasonable to maintain a lift that is already there.
Do you have a citation for your assertion, or is this your opinion? How do you suggest the OP uses your facts/ opinion given that they are not disabled?
I suggest you do more research into the EqAct before misinterpreting it. It's of no use to the OP.0 -
What's the relevance of fire regulations? Any evacuation plan should assume the lift is out of action anyway.sevenhills wrote: »The first place to ring would be the local fire station, ask them about fire regulations.0 -
In some circumstances very high rise blocks of flats require special firefighters' lifts. This might be at the back of IAmWales's mind, but these regulations are far removed from the block discussed here.
I don't think the fire service will be your allies for this. They strongly advise against using lifts in a fire situation. The lift might lose power and no-one wants to be trapped inside a sealed metal box in a fire. In fact the lift should have warnings to use the stairs and not the lift in an emergency.0 -
How on earth has this thread got side-tracked onto the fire service? :huh:
Sammy you have several possible courses to follow
1) the tenancy agreement and its implied terms. You could argue this in court - but then probably receive a S21 Notice
2) the leases - you need to obtain and read. Either ask the resident leaseholder and/or pay the land registry for a copy. If the leases stipulate a lift, the freeholder cannot remove the lift
3) joint action. Would the LL reconsider if all his tenants walked?
4) joint action. Would the LL reconsider if all his tenants offered to pay an increased rent?
5) find another tenancy0 -
Do you have a citation for your assertion, or is this your opinion? How do you suggest the OP uses your facts/ opinion given that they are not disabled?
I suggest you do more research into the EqAct before misinterpreting it. It's of no use to the OP.
Not sure if 6 flats qualifies as a block, but a phone call to the fire service is very easy.Since 1st October 2006 every block of flats will require a fire safety risk assessment.
http://www.flat-living.co.uk/advice/373-fire-regulation0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards