We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
A FSCS query relating to individual funds
Audaxer
Posts: 3,552 Forumite
I know that client funds invested are kept separate from the platform provider's funds, so you shouldn't need to worry about the £50k FSCS limit if the platform provider goes out of business. However I was wondering if it is safe to have more than £50k invested in any individual fund like for instance a Vanguard Life Strategy fund?
0
Comments
-
The same principle applies to funds as to platforms. The fund is a separate entity to the company that manages it.0
-
At fund level, it is £50k per fund house. Not per fund.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0
-
-
That's a bit of a surprise as it seems from this forum that quite a lot of DIY investors have fairly substantial amounts in VLS funds.
I guess it depends how you view that risk. I'd think there are more likely risks to worry about before that being an issue. Vanguard are a huge company so even if there was fraud on one fund it would be very unlikely to affect others and FSCS only would be relevant if the company had failed and had no assets.Remember the saying: if it looks too good to be true it almost certainly is.0 -
Is the risk the same as with the platforms providers, i.e. only if there was some sort of fraud? Am I right in thinking that in the unlikely event that the fund house ceased trading, the actual investments in the funds, i.e. the shares and bonds, would still be fully protected and could not be used to pay fund houses debts?I guess it depends how you view that risk. I'd think there are more likely risks to worry about before that being an issue. Vanguard are a huge company so even if there was fraud on one fund it would be very unlikely to affect others and FSCS only would be relevant if the company had failed and had no assets.0 -
Is the risk the same as with the platforms providers, i.e. only if there was some sort of fraud? Am I right in thinking that in the unlikely event that the fund house ceased trading, the actual investments in the funds, i.e. the shares and bonds, would still be fully protected and could not be used to pay fund houses debts?
Yes, though you should use normal caution. Anything available via one of the standard online brokers should be fine, something sold by a cold caller may not.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.2K Life & Family
- 260.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards