We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Nationwide don't know difference between Sec 75 and Chargeback or it me?
Comments
-
i used chargeback to claim a refund of a substandard room at a B and B, and for the night after which we didn't use because the room was so dirty, we got a full refund using chargeback but it took ages, approx 8 weeks.0
-
So that was a dispute over the quality of service.0
-
How do i find the visa chargeback guidelines?0
-
miniphernalia wrote: »How do i find the visa chargeback guidelines?
https://www.barclaycard.co.uk/business/files/chargebacks-reason-codes-guide.pdf has the reason codes in an easy to read format.
http://usa.visa.com/download/merchants/chargeback-management-guidelines-for-visa-merchants.pdf is more thorough but a little OTT if you're just interested in the codes.0 -
Reason code 53.
Perhaps your version hasn't been updated since April?
I don't understand how the OP can claim the paint is defective. From what they've said it sounds more like bad workmanship. I can see why Nationwide are reluctant to dispute this, based on what the OP has said we wouldn't dispute it. I would class this as a quality of service issue which isn't covered by code 53. It would be different if the OP has proof the paint was defective.0 -
I don't understand how the OP can claim the paint is defective. From what they've said it sounds more like bad workmanship. I can see why Nationwide are reluctant to dispute this, based on what the OP has said we wouldn't dispute it. I would class this as a quality of service issue which isn't covered by code 53. It would be different if the OP has proof the paint was defective.
Honestly, just read the updated information. You're not helping the OP by keeping on with the misinformation, and it's a little bizarre when the reference material is right in front of you
0 -
I would class this as a quality of service issue which isn't covered by code 53. It would be different if the OP has proof the paint was defective.
Why wouldn't code 53 cover the quality of the service performed?
M53 Not as described
–the cardholder is stating that the service/goods that they received were either
defective or not what was originally described to them by the merchant,
0 -
shaun_from_Africa wrote: »Why wouldn't code 53 cover the quality of the service performed?
IMO it's very much one word against another though. Who's to decide who's right?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards