We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

LETTER OF CLAIM - Advice please!

2»

Comments

  • System
    System Posts: 178,375 Community Admin
    10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Does the fact that they are stating this public property as private render any litigation nul and void?

    The answer is no. Anyone can start litigation but whether it will stand up in court is another matter.

    Plymouth is not the only local authority down there that indulges in the suspension of statute for their own interpretation of the laws. Strangely none of the parking operators have so far tested their client's legal view in a court.
    This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com
  • Pyrrhical
    Pyrrhical Posts: 6 Forumite
    I have just found out that the street I parked on IS in fact private property. The street named on the letter of claim is public.
    The beavis vs parking eye case effectively wiped out gpeol defences, to my understanding anyway. HOWEVER, the ruling was on 04 November 2015. The supposed date of contravention was 30 October. Can I use gpeol as a defence because the ruling was after the fact??
  • System
    System Posts: 178,375 Community Admin
    10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Is the road maintained at public expense?
    This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com
  • Pyrrhical
    Pyrrhical Posts: 6 Forumite
    The actual street that the car was parked in does not seem to have a name as it only has 1 house on it, so it is hard to say. The road that it stems from however is maintained at public expense. Sorry not greatly helpful. I think I might knock on the door of that house and ask what the address is.
  • Coupon-mad
    Coupon-mad Posts: 155,731 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    The beavis vs parking eye case effectively wiped out gpeol defences, to my understanding anyway. HOWEVER, the ruling was on 04 November 2015. The supposed date of contravention was 30 October. Can I use gpeol as a defence because the ruling was after the fact??

    Absolutely not, do not even go there!

    Your defence would be just like the other ones about private roads that look like public highway; we've seen a few in our time. I remember posting on a thread like this last week where the address was in High Wycombe. The poster won.
    PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
    CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
    Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.