aardll Forumite

ok hearing was adjourned today, the judge said there wasn't enough time to go through all the evidence I'd submittedfurious because their rep didn't even have a copy of my witness statement, I literally had to give him a copy also proved to the judge that I'd served it to them, (although she was happy that I'd done so…

found it "B2.2.The Customer shall use each item of the Data only for the Reasonable Cause for which it was provided. The Customer understands thateach item of the Data may be used only in relation to the particular date, 20event and purpose for which it was requested and must not be re-used for any other date, event or…

taken from https://www.parkingcowboys.co.uk/data-protection-act/: "Keeping data on record – The KADOE contract specifies that a parking company must re-request your data for each parking event (in the case of multiple breaches). You can ask the DVLA to provide details of when your records were accessed. If they have not…

was this document ever found? was hoping to quote it in the hearing tomorrow

yeah I did

Hearing is scheduled for Wednesday 12th, haven't actually had any correspondence to say they have actually paid for the hearing and that it's actually going ahead - just assuming it is.Any final tips or things I need to prepare beforehand?Thanks for everyone's help so far.

Coup, is there a link to a document issued by the DVLA which states that fact? I'll likely need to reference it in the hearing.

Looks to be quite the opposite to be honest. Letter today saying we refute your costs and a few points as follows: They're leaning quite heavily on the fact that my DVLA details weren't up to date (noting that the charges were issued in oct 18 and jan 19 this year). Second CCJ was dated May, details correct with DVLA as of…

No hearing date has been confirmed yet, I had until the 16th to get the WS and Evidence in which I did but I'm still waiting on a hearing date.

also, they've stated in this letter if I don't accept the offer "they will continue with the claim for the full amount claimed". Is this a standard line they put into every single one of these letters?

Is this acceptable?: 17/12/2019 Excel Parking Services Limited Litigation Department WITHOUT PREJUDICE, SAVE AS TO COSTS Dear Sir/Madam RE: X and X I am replying to your letter dated 11/12/2019 regarding the above claims. The debt you claim I owe you is denied. It is my belief that you owe me £510 for the costs of having…

I'll have to post it tomorrow, they apparently won't accept litigation correspondence by email.

Thanks coup, so they've not actually said they're discontinuing the claims but you're saying they're very likely to now? Also what's interesting is the letter with the offer on has the second claim ref. on it. The two claims were consolidated with the first ref. being the lead number. Likely they'll send another letter…

Hello, need some advice - do I need to reply to the letter they have posted with the "£85" offer in?

Hi Redx Stating what?

I've submitted a costs schedule of 1005 pounds. 510 for the costs of the set asides and the rest on the time I've spent writing documents. 30 hours at £19 an hour. The remainder being postage. That letter they've sent is also dated before they'd have even received my WS/Evidence. Next move?

I didn't include the consumer rights act in the WS or evidence.

Costs schedule was submitted. Unreasonable behavior is the trump card (they passed my details onto DCBL after the court had given them direction that it was a defended claim) and ridiculous signage on the site. I've received a letter from them today stating that they are confident they have a good case against me but will…

well worst case scenario (I'm hoping) is I'll have to pay 30 quid twice which is what the original charge was for the alleged "violation of the contract" :rolleyes: on that basis I'd have lost the hearing, they'd make me pay for the cost of it yes?

Well the WS was sent today with all the evidence. TBH the fact that I've an email from the landowner saying they were happy for the charges to be reduced back to the original 30 pounds means at worst I'm going to be 60 pounds lighter. Although I'm going to have to likely pay the hearing fee as well. I'm still hopeful the…