We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
We're aware that some users are currently experiencing errors on the Forum. Our tech team is working to resolve the issue. Thanks for your patience.
Council Tax Rebanding FAILURE stories
aqua1711
Posts: 4 Newbie
in Cutting tax
Hello,
I have read with interest the many success stories of Council Tax Rebanding claims via the Local Council and VOA. Whilst this is excellent news, myself and many others (I assume) have not faired so well in thier claims.
I was approached by a neighbour who advised me that my Banding was inconsistent with others in my road. There are only 8 houses in my road, mine being No 2;
Numbers 1 & 2, Semi-Detatched, 3 Bed - Band D
Numbers 3 & 4, Semi-Detatched, 4 Bed - Band D
Numbers 5 & 6, Semi-Detatched, 3 Bed - Band C
Numbers 7 & 8, Semi-Detatched, 3 Bed - Band C
Numbers 1,2,5,6,7 & 8 are identical in build, only 3 & 4 are larger hence the higher banding.
Myself and No 1 applied for a banding review as we felt we should be in Band C along with other similar properties in the road. During the purchase of my house I and in the details from my solicitor I found the original purchase price of the house in 1996 when it was built, this price put the house into Band C. I had also used the Halifax House Price Calculator using the purchase price then and also the recent purchase price, this also put the house into Band C.
Therefore my girlfriend and I assumed that this would be so straightforward and we would be rebanded and given a small rebate for the overpayments.
However, not too long ago we received a letter from the VOA stating that Numbers 1 & 2 bandings were correct but numbers 5,6,7,& 8 were incorrect and put them all up to Band D!! I was absolutely fuming, I telephoned the office and spoke to the officer dealing with it, they were adament that thier decision was based on house value in 1991 and all thier calculations put the house into Band D but they wouldn't reveal how they calculated thier figures.
Has anyone else had experiences similar to this?
Can this decisions be appealed against? ( We have been in the property for nearly 2 years)
Are the VOA allowed to raise the banding of 4 properties to avoid lowering the banding of 2?
Any advice will be greatly appreciated.
Please also use thread to post similar experiences in the hope that someone will be able to help.
Thank you for your time.
I have read with interest the many success stories of Council Tax Rebanding claims via the Local Council and VOA. Whilst this is excellent news, myself and many others (I assume) have not faired so well in thier claims.
I was approached by a neighbour who advised me that my Banding was inconsistent with others in my road. There are only 8 houses in my road, mine being No 2;
Numbers 1 & 2, Semi-Detatched, 3 Bed - Band D
Numbers 3 & 4, Semi-Detatched, 4 Bed - Band D
Numbers 5 & 6, Semi-Detatched, 3 Bed - Band C
Numbers 7 & 8, Semi-Detatched, 3 Bed - Band C
Numbers 1,2,5,6,7 & 8 are identical in build, only 3 & 4 are larger hence the higher banding.
Myself and No 1 applied for a banding review as we felt we should be in Band C along with other similar properties in the road. During the purchase of my house I and in the details from my solicitor I found the original purchase price of the house in 1996 when it was built, this price put the house into Band C. I had also used the Halifax House Price Calculator using the purchase price then and also the recent purchase price, this also put the house into Band C.
Therefore my girlfriend and I assumed that this would be so straightforward and we would be rebanded and given a small rebate for the overpayments.
However, not too long ago we received a letter from the VOA stating that Numbers 1 & 2 bandings were correct but numbers 5,6,7,& 8 were incorrect and put them all up to Band D!! I was absolutely fuming, I telephoned the office and spoke to the officer dealing with it, they were adament that thier decision was based on house value in 1991 and all thier calculations put the house into Band D but they wouldn't reveal how they calculated thier figures.
Has anyone else had experiences similar to this?
Can this decisions be appealed against? ( We have been in the property for nearly 2 years)
Are the VOA allowed to raise the banding of 4 properties to avoid lowering the banding of 2?
Any advice will be greatly appreciated.
Please also use thread to post similar experiences in the hope that someone will be able to help.
Thank you for your time.
0
Comments
-
The VOA isn't allowed to 'raise the banding of 4 properties to avoid lowering the banding of 2', however they are allowed to raise the banding of the four properties if they feel that they have evidence that it was your two houses that were correctly banded.
The people whose houses have been rebanded have a right to a tribunal hearing if the rebanding was made within the last six months. I would urge them ALL to appeal against the reband and start compiling evidence as to why. Worst case scenario, they lose and stay a D, but at least the principle is tested as to who is right.
However, if you are going to go to tribunal be prepared to put up good evidence and start working now. For my case and subsequent ones I have worked on it has taken a good 20 hours + to build an evidence file.
As your neighbours are filing their appeal notices with the VOA, they should also be asking the VOA under the Freedom of Information Act to provide evidence with how they arrived at their decision. Inform them that your intention is to have this matter addressed by independent tribunal so that the VOA cannot possibly think that you are willing to roll over and give up. At tribunal they will have to reveal evidence as to why they have put the valuations up anyway.
Once you are in sight of this you will have a better idea as to who is right.
Its easy for neighbours to get bitter and divide in these situations, but what you really need to do is work together and fight back.
Good luck!Please stay safe in the sun and learn the A-E of melanoma: A = asymmetry, B = irregular borders, C= different colours, D= diameter, larger than 6mm, E = evolving, is your mole changing? Most moles are not cancerous, any doubts, please check next time you visit your GP.
0 -
The wording is important. Are they increasing the others to avoid lowering or are they correcting the error of under valuing by correctly increasingt the others?I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards