We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
pension and the triviality rules

sandraroffey
Posts: 1,358 Forumite
any advice here please. i have a very small pension with prudential and i have been trying t get them to let me have whats left of it as a lump sum as per the triviality rules. the total would be around 8k. the monthly amount i get is just over £34. hardly a life changing amount!! however, they just wont agree to let it happen. i have had a couple of letters from them, bleeting about how i am supposed to be making an income for myself without relying on the state, (on £34 a month???). however, one thing that keeps being said is that it is at the discretion of the company and the company is saying no. prudential did say that they, 'along with most other providers are refusing these requests'. now, if that is the case, what on earth is the point of the new legislation that has been put in place. it must cost them more in administration to pay me, than what they pay me!! and to have that as a lump sum could make things a lot easier for me. i pay more than than on interest on credit. it could all be paid off and i could live a little more normally. anyone any ideas on how to approach this one??? thanks a lot.xxx
0
Comments
-
sandraroffey wrote: »any advice here please. i have a very small pension with prudential and i have been trying t get them to let me have whats left of it as a lump sum as per the triviality rules. the total would be around 8k. the monthly amount i get is just over £34. hardly a life changing amount!! however, they just wont agree to let it happen. i have had a couple of letters from them, bleeting about how i am supposed to be making an income for myself without relying on the state, (on £34 a month???). however, one thing that keeps being said is that it is at the discretion of the company and the company is saying no. prudential did say that they, 'along with most other providers are refusing these requests'. now, if that is the case, what on earth is the point of the new legislation that has been put in place. it must cost them more in administration to pay me, than what they pay me!! and to have that as a lump sum could make things a lot easier for me. i pay more than than on interest on credit. it could all be paid off and i could live a little more normally. anyone any ideas on how to approach this one??? thanks a lot.xxx
This is news to me. Like you, I thought this was now the law. Bump Bump.
Any thoughts kind MSEers?
terryw"If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken
Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools"
Extract from "If" by Rudyard Kipling0 -
Have a word with TPAS and if it's clear that you are entitled to do trivial commutation on a pension already in payment, complain to the ombudsman.
http://www.pensionsadvisoryservice.org.uk/
Trying to keep it simple...0 -
EdInvestor wrote: »Have a word with TPAS and if it's clear that you are entitled to do trivial commutation on a pension already in payment, complain to the ombudsman.
http://www.pensionsadvisoryservice.org.uk/
Thanks for that Ed. Bump bump. Any other ideas kind folks?
terryw"If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken
Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools"
Extract from "If" by Rudyard Kipling0 -
It is as I understand it at the discretion of the company ( Pru told me the same) so im my case (aged 50 with a PP fund of £7000) i thought what the hell it'll never amount to anything significant anyways so I transfered it into a drawdown plan that gave me a couple of grand cash and £300 initially a year taxable income.
Should be enough to cover a months phone calls to my columbian cough "coffee" suppliers who provide my real tax free pension0 -
thats what i had when i first started drawing the pension, a small lump sum then £34 a month for ever. it was only 11k at the outset and must be about 7-8 now. you are right, it will amount to nothing, but could make my life a lot easier as a lump. is there any way around this 'at the discretion of the company'? i am going to complain the the ombudsman, but if it is at prudentials discretion, are they going to change their mind i wonder??
clearly they dont want to part with the dosh!!!!!0 -
Could anyone give an idiot's guide to the triviality rules? I have looked at the various news items but they seem neither clear nor concise.
In my case I receive a small endowment pension via the Prudential which was bought with AVCs alongside my Teachers' pension and it would be a great help if it could be commuted.0 -
http://www.pensionsadvisoryservice.org.uk/personal_and_stakeholder_pensions/triviality/
is the best i can find.0 -
This is what Prudential say themselves !
http://scottish-amicable.com/content/acrobat/DBST10013.pdf
The Pensions Ombudsman will help if necessary - TPAS will point you in the right direction.
http://www.pensionsadvisoryservice.org.uk/contact_tpas/0 -
I thought u had to be at least 60 re trivial rules..and i presume not to have taken the tax free cash element..but hey what do i know0
-
Basically you need to be aged 60 and to have total pensions (excluding state) worth a max of around 17,500 (figure increases annually) to use the triviality rule.
So anyone with a teachers pension would not be eligible.Trying to keep it simple...0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards