We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

NHS Pension Advice Needed

My mum is retiring in August at the age of 60 and is in good health. She has a decision to make about her NHS pension.
It's a question of whether to take a lump sum of around 30,000 and pension of 10,100 or lump sum of 54,000 and pension of 8,100.

Her mortgage is already paid off and has savings and investments of around 100,000 so the lump sum payment is there to be invested.

If anyone has an opinion on which option is best would be much appreciated.

Thanks

Comments

  • Ian_W
    Ian_W Posts: 3,778 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic
    Hi Chis and welcome,
    I'm certainly no expert but you're near the bottom of P1 with no takers so at least you'll get bumped. I don't believe there is a "right" answer as such but there are pros and cons of each option and your Mum has got to decide which she feels is best for her, she'll only know if it actually was best with hindsight I'm afraid.

    Lump Sum pros - it's tax free, she's got the money to do with as she wishes now while she's younger, if something tragic happens reasonably soon after retirement she will have left it as part of her estate. If she invests it well it could do better than the RPI increases she'd get if she's taken it as pension.
    Cons - The lump is only 12x the amount surrendered so if she lives beyond 72, and life expectancy suggests she should live twice that long at least, then she could lose out in monetary terms. Any income generated is likely to be taxable, unless or until she gets it into ISAs or other tax free vehicles, which makes it more difficult to beat RPI growth of her pension.

    Finally she ought to consider age allowance. Won't apply until she's 65 - but then she will be able to have income of £10K tax free but that gets clawed if her income [state, nhs pensions and savings income exceeds around £21K].

    HTH.
  • EdInvestor
    EdInvestor Posts: 15,749 Forumite
    She needs to look at her tax position: what will be her total pension and other taxable income (incl state pension, savings interest and any other taxable investment income) bearing in mind her age allowance at 65 - likely to be around 10k, and the age allowance clawback level, currently about 22k, where you incur penal taxation.
    Trying to keep it simple...;)
  • misterh
    misterh Posts: 146 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I'm no financial expert but simple maths says that the £24000 bigger lump sum would have to give a return of over 8.33% to beat the £2000 a year bigger pension.
    On the other hand, the larger lump sum adds to your mother's estate.

    I think as a son I would tell my parents to take the bigger pension but as a parent I would want to leave more.
    "Beer. Now there's a temporary solution." Homer (Simpson)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.