We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Does Moore's Law still apply ?

chunter
chunter Posts: 2,026 Forumite
Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
Just wondering if Gordon E Moore's 1965 paper still roughly applies

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore's_law

I haven't heard it mentioned in a few years.
Wikipedia has a graph but it stops in 2004

Comments

  • isofa
    isofa Posts: 6,091 Forumite
    I can see no reason why it shouldn't still apply, especially if you look at the current processors with their predecessors.
  • BillScarab
    BillScarab Posts: 6,027 Forumite
    I've read articles recently that suggested it still applies, although now multi-core CPUs are common it is slightly different as the number of transistors is split over more than one CPU.

    Intel certainly seem to think they're keeping up http://www.intel.com/technology/mooreslaw/
    It's my problem, it's my problem
    If I feel the need to hide
    And it's my problem if I have no friends
    And feel I want to die


  • esuhl
    esuhl Posts: 9,409 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Everyone always says "Moore's Law can't apply forever", but so far it seems to have. Every time they hit a supposed "brick wall" in development, a new solution to allow the transistor count to increase has been found.
  • TonyLisaP
    TonyLisaP Posts: 505 Forumite
    On the flipside of the question, does Murphy's law still apply?
    If that does then so does Moores law.
  • fwor
    fwor Posts: 6,943 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    The wiki that the OP points to includes some fairly strong indicators that it can continue for a while, but there are several factors that will make it very hard to continue for more than perhaps 20 years, some of which are:

    the size of the structures is limited by the wavelength of light used in photolithography - if you go to shorter wavelengths, the light is harder to focus

    the size of the structures is limited by the size of the atoms of material they are made of

    the heat dissipation of a CPU has turned out to be higher as clock speed increases than expected.

    While the wiki quotes several techniques (multiple cores, nanothechnology and quantum effects, perhaps), it seems there are some very difficult problems to be solved.

    The wiki does also highlight another effect of increasing processor power: as the hardware gets more powerful, the software writers can get away with putting more "bloat" in their programs, which therefore need more processor power to run....
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.1K Life & Family
  • 260.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.