We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Consolidation loans - Mis-selling

2»

Comments

  • petermb_2
    petermb_2 Posts: 1,565 Forumite
    Well to each his own I suppose - I prefer to see evidence before getting people's hopes up based on just a few words in a public forum.

    If only you could point to one case he has ''supported'' and something has come about because of it.
    I post and read these boards on a regular basis and as far as I can see nothing ever comes of his posts.

    I use evidence. Everything is based on appeal court decisions and Queens Counsel Opinion. It is called law. I have said many times before, the knowledge base I use is second to none and from people who would be considered to be industry experts.

    I try to assist but cannot advertise the service I offer as this is not the policy of this site.
    I am a former Broker, former IFA and former compliance officer, for my sins.

    However, I have since seen the light.
  • petermb_2
    petermb_2 Posts: 1,565 Forumite
    Scousebird wrote: »
    How can a bank be penalised for doing something you signed to do-I bet you weren't argueing when the funds were placed into your account-you have chosen to do debt consolodation which is exactly what I did-and I know that I did that to reduce my outgoings and pay off my debts to have one committment and one only-how can any bank be blamed for me making this decision-all they did was supported me in my enquiry. Amazing how some people think!

    Spoken like a true employee of the lenders.
    The lenders have responsibilities to the law and to the client. Sadly they have fallen short in so many areas and will now have to pay the price.
    I am a former Broker, former IFA and former compliance officer, for my sins.

    However, I have since seen the light.
  • petermb wrote: »
    Spoken like a true employee of the lenders.
    The lenders have responsibilities to the law and to the client. Sadly they have fallen short in so many areas and will now have to pay the price.

    I got ripped off because I bought a plasma tv from currys for £1000 because i saw one of their flashy adverts, then I found out that currys only paid their supplier £500 for it.

    Can you help me reclaim the £500 please?
  • bartsimpson
    bartsimpson Posts: 745 Forumite
    validata wrote: »
    Interesting analogy but rather missing the point.

    Imagine how you would feel if Curry's advertised the plasma TV for £500 but charged you £1000 - ripped off now?

    I wouldn't hand over any money to curry's until they told me exactly how much the plasma cost. As soon as they said £1000 I would have said 'no thanks'

    If I had said 'ok then, here's £1000', then it's my own stupidity for being ripped off.

    If you've made your own bed, then lie in it...
  • neverdespairgirl
    neverdespairgirl Posts: 16,501 Forumite
    petermb wrote: »
    I use evidence. Everything is based on appeal court decisions and Queens Counsel Opinion. It is called law.

    Court of Appeal decisions and Queen's Counsel Opinions, surely? The latter is as it says, an opinion, not law.
    ...much enquiry having been made concerning a gentleman, who had quitted a company where Johnson was, and no information being obtained; at last Johnson observed, that 'he did not care to speak ill of any man behind his back, but he believed the gentleman was an attorney'.
  • petermb_2
    petermb_2 Posts: 1,565 Forumite
    Appeal court decisions create law. QC's give opinions on those appeal court decisions. That is my understanding.
    I am a former Broker, former IFA and former compliance officer, for my sins.

    However, I have since seen the light.
  • neverdespairgirl
    neverdespairgirl Posts: 16,501 Forumite
    petermb wrote: »
    Appeal court decisions create law. QC's give opinions on those appeal court decisions. That is my understanding.

    It's Court of Appeal, rather than Appeal Court. It doesn't have to be that high up to create a precedent, though - High Court cases, Asylum and Immigration Tribunal cases, Crown Court, Employment Appeal Tribunal, they can all be used as a precedent, among many others.

    QCs don't just give opinions on Court of Appeal cases. Barristers in general advise all the time on the law, where there might or might not be relevant case law. Or there might be tagentally relevant law, or something that can be referred to in another area of law.
    ...much enquiry having been made concerning a gentleman, who had quitted a company where Johnson was, and no information being obtained; at last Johnson observed, that 'he did not care to speak ill of any man behind his back, but he believed the gentleman was an attorney'.
  • petermb_2
    petermb_2 Posts: 1,565 Forumite
    Can we stick to assiting those that need help.
    Court of appeal.............Appeal courts what is the difference.
    we should direct our attentions to the lenders and the issues....not who knows the correct term for a court of law.
    I am a former Broker, former IFA and former compliance officer, for my sins.

    However, I have since seen the light.
  • Tiddler_2
    Tiddler_2 Posts: 537 Forumite
    If the unsecured credit is consolidated into a regulated mortgage, then the mortgage adviser HAS to explain that the debt would be secured and that should you not keep up payments you could lose your home, along with explaining that if it is taken over a longer period of time then you'll pay more interest.

    If it is a secured loan, then they are not regulated under the FSA, and so you are not given advice, and you are at the mercy of the loan brokers as they do not even have to offer you the best rate. Some companies will often offer you the highest rate they can get away with.

    Therefore I would doubt if you could claim mis-selling but Peter may have more detailled knowledge on this!!
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.