We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Is CGT owed?
Comments
-
So are you saying that because the Title Absolute had only my name in section B in 2000 that my mother is/was not liable for CGT when the Title deeds/land registry were amended to remove the restriction in 2003?
Yes that's how I understand it.
Effectively your mother loaned you the money to purchase the house in 2000 and secured that loan by a charge on the property.
In 2003 that charge was removed effectively converting the loan into a gift.
Your mother will not be liable for any CGT on the house as it has never been owned by her.
Nigel0 -
Thank-you noh.
You mentioned the possibility of potential IHT in your previous post.
I understand that I would be liable for 7 years after the gift, would this be taken from 2000 or when the deeds were amended in 2003?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards